2012 (11) TMI 492

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r: Ashok Jindal 1. The appellants are in appeal against impugned order wherein a demand of service tax of Rs.52,27,935/- along with interest and various penalties were confirmed. 2. Head both sides. 3. The Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that out of impugned demand, they have already paid a sum of Rs.48,85,329/- along with interest of Rs.9,84,611/-. Considering the same is sufficient in c .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... firmed against them; therefore, we waive the requirement of pre-deposit of balance amount of service tax, interest and penalty and recovery thereof stayed during the pendency of the appeal and taken up the appeal itself for final disposal. 7. We do agree with the contention made by the Ld. Counsel for the appellant that impugned order is an ex-parte order; therefore, in the interest of justice, w .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X