2013 (2) TMI 222

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ) TMI 724 - CESTAT, BANGALORE] supplies to SEZ from DTA units were exports and hence not to be considered as exempted goods for purposes of Rule 6 of the CCR 2004. The appellant cannot be required to honour the impugned demand as they were clearing only dutiable products to the DTA and hence there was no question of maintenance of separate accounts in respect of inputs or input services and no .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... SEZ developers as exempted goods. Having found no separate accounts having been maintained in respect of inputs or input services, by the appellant, the department required them, in terms of Rule 6(3) of the CCR 2004, to pay 10% of the price (excluding taxes) of the goods cleared to the SEZ developers. This demand is presently under challenge. 2. In the case of Sujana Metal Products Ltd. Vs. C .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X