2013 (2) TMI 469

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nst Order-in-Appeal No. US/231/RGD/2012 dated 11.04.2012 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai. 2. The stay application is taken up for consideration. 3. The appellant M/s. Sandoz Pvt. Ltd. availed CENVAT credit amounting to Rs.6,31,914/- in respect of certain goods such as HDPE pallets, office furniture, ceramic tapes and F.R.P. Linings on pipes as capital goods and on .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... so submits that they are not disputing the tax liability. 5. The learned A.R. appearing for the Revenue reiterates the findings of the lower authorities and submits that in as much as the appellant is not disputing the tax liability, they should be put to terms. 6. I have carefully considered the rival submissions. 7. In as much as the appellant is not disputing the tax liability they cannot di .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X