TMI Blog2013 (3) TMI 38X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of employees - held that:- Credit allowed in view of CCE, Bangalore v. Bell Ceramics Ltd. - (011 (9) TMI 792 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT) and CCE, Bangalore-III v. Stanzen Toyotetsu India (P) Ltd. - (2011 (4) TMI 201 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT) - Decided in favor of assessee. This order has been rectified entirely by the CESTAT [ 2012 (10) TMI 1139 - CESTAT NEW DELHI ] X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... oyotetsu India (P) Ltd. - 2011 (23) S.T.R. 444 (Kar.)
4. Inasmuch as both the issues are covered by the decisions of the Hon'ble High Court, respectfully following the same, we set aside the impugned order and allow the appeal with consequential relief to the appellants. Stay petition as also appeal gets disposed of in the above manner.
(Order dictated and pronounced in the open Court) X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|