9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (4) TMI 122X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dgment of Delhi High court in Home Solutions Retails (India) Ltd case (supra), will be applied in the case of all respondents. Review petitions are disposed of as above. - RP.No. 408 of 2012 (E) IN WPC/6885/2009 & Others - - - Dated:- 12-9-2012 - MR. C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MR. BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH JJ. PETITIONER: BY ADV. SRI.JOHN VARGHESE,SC,CEN.BOARD OF EXCISE RESPONDENT: BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) .................................................. R.P.Nos.408 of 2012 in WP(C)No.6885 of 2009, 409 of 2012 in WP(C)No.1582 of 2010 , 411 of 2012 in WP(C)No.27172 of 2008, 412 of 2012 in WP(C)No.20158 of 2009, 419 of 2012 in WP(C)No.2113 of 2009, 420 of 2012 in WP(C)No.24923 of 2010, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in WP(C)No.34871 of 2009, 583 of 2012 in WP(C)No.27956 of 2009, 584 of 2012 in WP(C)No.36828 of 2009, 585 of 2012 in WP(C)No.35829 of 2007, 587 of 2012 in WP(C)No.31183 of 2010, 588 of 2012 in WP(C)No.29837 of 2010, 589 of 2012 in WP(C)No.1182 of 2010, 590 of 2012 in WP(C)No.17490 of 2009, 591of 2012 in WP(C)No.34542 of 2010, 592 of 2012 in WP(C)No.26736 of 2009 745 of 2012 in WP(C)No.36822 of 2007 ORDER RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J All these review petitions are filed for reviewing the common judgment in the writ petitions and writ appeals which were disposed of by this court, where under we upheld the constitutional validity of Section 65(105)(zzzz)and Section 66 of th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ourt, Supreme Court has passed a different conditional stay order directing payment of 50% of the arrears upto 30.9.2011 and furnishing of security with solvent sureties for the balance 50%. 3. The prayer in the review petitions is for modifying the judgment under review incorporating the above condition in the interim order passed by Supreme Court. Notice is not served on respondents in all the cases, but respondents appearing in few cases opposed the review petitions by stating that this court should not pass a stay order in variance with what Supreme Court has passed in the special leave petitions pending against the Full Bench decision of the Delhi High court relied on. 4. After hearing both sides, we do not think that the review pe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
