9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (6) TMI 434X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... lly released on the request of the petitioner subject to test report of CRCL, New Delhi. The Tribunal noticed that the CRCL report was against the petitioner and it remained unimpeached from the adjudicating process. It was in such circumstances that the petitioner was required to deposit amount of Rs. 8,08,572/- as a condition precedent for hearing the appeal. - No illegality or perversity could ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ar. It is engaged in the manufacture and export of Blankets and Shawls. It imported acrylic fibre under Advance licence No. 21313 dated 20-1-1998. The goods were imported without payment of customs duty with a condition that resultant product i.e. Shawls and blankets shall be exported. On 27-5-1999, the export consignment of 305 bales of the petitioner was allowed to be exported after examination ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d by the adjudicating authority and dismissed the appeal vide order dated 6-1-2009, Annexure P.2. The petitioner filed second appeal before the Tribunal alongwith stay application. The Tribunal vide impugned order dated 21-5-2012, Annexure P.4 directed the petitioner to deposit the whole amount of duty demanded i.e. Rs. 8,08,572/- within six weeks as a condition precedent for hearing the appeal. H ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... djudicating process. It was in such circumstances that the petitioner was required to deposit amount of Rs. 8,08,572/- as a condition precedent for hearing the appeal. 6. No illegality or perversity could be pointed out in the impugned order warranting interference by this Court. The petition is dismissed. However, any observation made herein shall not be treated to be expression of opinion on t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
