2013 (7) TMI 557

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ard Sri Nishant Mishra, learned counsel for the assessee revisionist. Sri U.K. Pandey, appears for the department. The two revisions relate to the assessment year 95-96 both under U.P. Trade Tax Act and Central Sales Tax Act. The assessing authority rejected the account books and determined the taxable turnover to the best of its judgment. In appeal preferred by the assessee, the taxable turnove .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... entry in the account books. The aforesaid argument has no substance for the reason that once the account books have been rejected on account of the fact that the aforesaid transactions were left out from being recorded therein, the turnover disclosed therein cannot be made the basis for assessment. Thus, the assessment made by the assessing authority to the best of its judgment ignoring the book .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... urnover under the Central Act has been reduced considerably by sum of Rs.2 crores and the same has been approved. Learned counsel for the assessee is unable to show what further reduction would have been possible in the taxable turnover. In view of above, I find that both the revisions stands concluded by findings of fact and that no question of law worth consideration arises in any of them. In .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X