2013 (7) TMI 860

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... UDGEMENT Per Mr. G.Raghuram:- The appellant has preferred the appeal against the order of the Adjudicating Authority dtd. 29.07.2011, confirming service tax levy of Rs. 63,10,891/-, dropping the service tax demand of Rs. 40,800/- towards small scale exemption of Rs. 4 lakh under Notification No.6/2005-ST dtd. 01.03.2005 and confirming a demand of interest under section 75 of Finance Act, 20 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t none appeared on behalf of the appellant nor any evidence of compliance of stay order dtd. 09.05.2012 i.e. deposit of Rs. 10 lakh within eight weeks from the date of this order was submitted. 4. On 20.02.2013 appeal was taken for consideration it was recorded that there is neither representation on behalf of the appellant nor any application for adjournment. Copy of order dtd. 23.01.2013 passe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tation on behalf of the appellant. 5. In view of the above obligation cast on the appellant to deposit Rs. 10 Lakh within eight weeks, by the order dated 09.05.2012, the appellant has founded to make the deposit and comply with the order. There is also, as on date no evidence of compliance for the order dtd 09.05.2012, passed by the Tribunal. 6. In the above said circumstances, the appeal stan .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X