Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2013 (8) TMI 142

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... - 16-1-2013 - AKIL KURESHI AND SONIA GOKANI, JJ. For the Appellant : Varun K. Patel. ORDER:- PER : Akil Kureshi Revenue is in appeal challenging the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ('the Tribunal' for short) dated 23.03.2012 raising following substantial questions of law for our consideration: "(i) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned ITAT has erred in law in confirming the order of the CIT(A) deleting the disallowance of deduction of Rs. 74,49,731/- u/s. 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act, 1961? (ii) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the assessee is entitled to get deduction of Rs. 74,49,731/- u/s. 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 though the assessee .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... such project. The assessee had to pay the fees to the Architects and Engineers. Additionally, assessee was also authorized to appoint any other Architect or Engineer, legal adviser and other professionals. He would appoint Sub-contractor or labour contractor for execution of the work. The assessee was authorized to admit the persons willing to join the scheme. The assessee was authorised to receive the contributions and other deposits and also raise demands from the members for dues and execute such demands through legal procedure. In case, for some reason, the member already admitted is deleted, the assessee would have the full right to include new member in place of outgoing member. He had to make necessary financial arrangements for whi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... engaging professional agencies and so on. Most significantly, the risk element was entirely that of the assessee. The land owner agreed to accept only a fixed price for the land in question. The assessee agreed to pay off the land owner first before appropriating any part of the sale consideration of the housing units for his benefit. In short, assessee took the full risk of executing the housing project and thereby making profit or loss as the case may be. The assessee invested its own funds in the cost of construction and engagement of several agencies. Land owner would receive a fix predetermined amount towards the price of land and was thus insulated against any risk." 4. We are informed that such decision of this Court was challenge .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates