2013 (8) TMI 559

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... N KUMAR AND B. MANOHAR , JJ. For the Appellant : K.V. Arvind. For the Respondent : S. Parthasarathi. JUDGMENT:- PER : N. Kumar The Revenue has preferred this appeal against the order passed by the Tribunal which has up held the order of the appellate authority directing the assessing authority to withdraw the depreciation. 2. This appeal was admitted on 18.09.2007 to conside .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ation to the assessment year 1998-99. The appellate authority accepted the said contention and set aside the order of the assessing authority and granted deletion of depreciation. Aggrieved by the same, the Revenue preferred an appeal before the Tribunal, which rightly dismissed the appeal. 5. This Court in the case of CIT v. Mysore Cements Ltd. [IT Appeal No.3101/05 decided on 9th March, 2010] .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X