2013 (8) TMI 684

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ificate - Following decision of Tata Motors Ltd. vs. CCE, Lucknow [2011 (5) TMI 233 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI] - Decided in favour of assessee. - Appeal No. 3385 of 2005 - - - Dated:- 3-5-2013 - Ms. Archana Wadhwa and Shri Rakesh Kumar, JJ. For the Appellant: Shri Amit Jain, Advocate For the Respondent: Shri Sanjay Jain, Authorized Representative (DR) JUDGEMENT Per. Archana Wadhwa :- .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hicle has to be necessarily registered within the initial period of three months. 3. We find that the issue is no more res-integra and stand settled in the appellants own case reported as Tata Motors Ltd. vs. CCE, Lucknow 2012 (278) E.L.T. 685 (Tri. Del.). It stands held with the said decision that the extended period of three months, as mentioned in the notification, is for registration of the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X