2013 (9) TMI 506

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... cted the appellant to pre-deposit an amount of Rs. 1.5 lakhs towards penalty within six weeks and report compliance to the Assistant Registrar on 26.11.2012 vide Stay Order No. 1518/2012 dated 06.9.2012. The report of the Assistant Registrar is to the effect that there is no compliance with the above direction. In the present miscellaneous application filed by the appellant, they seek modification .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nce, the same is liable to be rejected in limine. In taking this view, we are supported by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court's judgement in the case of Baron International Ltd. vs. Union of India [2004 (163) E.L.T. 150 (Bom.)]. 3. The miscellaneous application, therefore, gets dismissed and consequently, the appeal gets dismissed for non-compliance with Section 129E of the Customs Act in the absence .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X