9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (10) TMI 125X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n and appointment of members to the C.B.E. & C. from the year 2009 to 2011 - Delay in reports - Held that:- Mr. V. Sreekumar, CPIO has prima facie caused a delay of more than 100 days in providing the information to the appellant. A separate show cause notice u/s 20(1) of the RTI Act would be issued to Mr. V. Sreekumar, who was the CPIO at the relevant time asking him to show-cause why a penalty o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... evenue vide his reply dated 10-10-2011 provided the information at point (a) and with regards to point (b), the inspection was allowed after applying the severability clause. The CPIO invited the appellant to come for inspection on 21-10-2011. The appellant vide his letter dated 2-11-2011 informed the respondent CPIO that the said letter dated 10-10-2011 from CPIO was received by the appellant onl ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tion of the files which allegedly was received by the appellant on 2-11-2011. 4. The complainant has stated in his complaint before the Commission that as the first appellate authority is not empowered to take penal action under Section 20 of the RTI Act, hence the complainant is filing the present complaint under Section 18 before the Commission. The complainant has also prayed for initiating d ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... at the same may kindly be furnished to this Secretariat for providing the information to Shri R.K Jain . 6. The Commission is of the view that Mr. V. Sreekumar, CPIO has prima facie caused a delay of more than 100 days in providing the information to the appellant. A separate show cause notice u/s 20(1) of the RTI Act would be issued to Mr. V. Sreekumar, who was the CPIO at the relevant time ask ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
