TMI BlogMemorandum Part-I (Income-tax)X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ing interest on securities), winnings from lotteries or crossword puzzles, winnings from horse races, card games and other categories of income liable to deduction or collection of tax at source under the Income-tax Act; rates for computation of "advance tax", deduction of income-tax from, or payment of tax on, 'Salaries' and charging of income-tax on current incomes in certain cases for the financial year 2010-11. 3. Subject to certain exceptions, which have been indicated while dealing with the relevant provisions, changes in the provisions of the tax laws are ordinarily proposed to be prospective in their operation. 4. The substance of the main provisions of the Bill relating to direct taxes is explained in the following paragraphs. INCOME-TAX Rates of Income-tax I. Rates of income-tax in respect of income liable to tax for the assessment year 2010-11 In respect of income of all categories of assessees liable to tax for the assessment year 2010-11, the rates of income-tax have been specified in Part I of the First Schedule to the Bill. These are the same as those laid down in Part III of the First Schedule to the Finance (No.2) Act, 2009, for the purposes of computation of "adva ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of such tax, where the income or the aggregate of such incomes paid or likely to be paid and subject to the deduction exceeds one crore rupees. No surcharge will be levied on deductions in other cases. (2) Education Cess— "Education Cess on income-tax" and "Secondary and Higher Education Cess on income-tax" shall continue to be levied at the rate of two per cent. and one per cent. respectively, of income tax including surcharge wherever applicable, in the cases of persons not resident in India including companies other than domestic company. III. Rates for deduction of income-tax at source from "Salaries", computation of "advance tax" and charging of incometax in special cases during the financial year 2010-11 The rates for deduction of income-tax at source from "Salaries" during the financial year 2010-11 and also for computation of "advance tax" payable during the said year in the case of all categories of assessees have been specified in Part III of the First Schedule to the Bill. These rates are also applicable for charging income-tax during the financial year 2010-11 on current incomes in cases where accelerated assessments have to be made, for instance, provisional assessment ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... be levied. D. Local authorities The rate of income-tax in the case of every local authority is specified in Paragraph D of Part III of the First Schedule to the Bill. This rate will continue to be the same as that specified for the assessment year 2010-11. No surcharge will be levied. E. Companies The rates of income-tax in the case of companies are specified in Paragraph E of Part III of the First Schedule to the Bill. These rates are the same as those specified for the assessment year 2010-11. The existing surcharge of ten per cent. on a domestic company is proposed to be reduced to seven and one-half per cent. In case of companies other than domestic companies, the surcharge shall be levied at the same rate and subject to the same conditions as were applicable for the assessment year 2010-11. However, the total amount payable as income-tax and surcharge on total income exceeding one crore rupees shall not exceed the total amount payable as income-tax on a total income of one crore rupees by more than the amount of income that exceeds one crore rupees. The existing surcharge of ten per cent. in all other cases (including sections 115JB, 115-O, 115R, etc.) is proposed to be reduce ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he source rule was to bring to tax interest, royalty and fees for technical services, by creating a legal fiction in section 9, even in cases where services are provided outside India as long as they are utilized in India. The source rule, therefore, means that the situs of the rendering of services is not relevant. It is the situs of the payer and the situs of the utilization of services which will determine the taxability of such services in India. This was the settled position of law till 2007. However, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the case of Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Ltd., Vs DIT (2007)[288 ITR 408], held that despite the deeming fiction in section 9, for any such income to be taxable in India, there must be sufficient territorial nexus between such income and the territory of India. It further held that for establishing such territorial nexus, the services have to be rendered in India as well as utilized in India. This interpretation was not in accordance with the legislative intent that the situs of rendering service in India is not relevant as long as the services are utilized in India. Therefore, to remove doubts regarding the source rule, an Explanation was in ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... units in both the SEZ and the domestic tariff area (DTA) vis-à-vis those assessees who were having units in only the SEZ. With a view to removing the anomaly, the provisions of sub-section (7) of section 10AA of the Income-tax Act were amended. In order to make the amendment effective for earlier years, it is proposed, by inserting a proviso to sub-section (7), to provide that the provision of sub-section (7), as amended by Finance (No. 2) Act 2009, will apply to the assessment year 2006-07 and subsequent assessment years. [Clause 6] Cancellation of registration obtained under section 12A Section 12AA provides the procedure relating to registration of a trust or institution engaged in charitable activities. Section 12AA(3) currently provides that if the activities of the trust or institution are found to be non-genuine or its activities are not in accordance with the objects for which such trust or institution was established, the registration granted under section 12AA can be cancelled by the Commissioner after providing the trust or institution an opportunity of being heard. The power of cancellation of registration is inherent and flows from the authority of granting registrati ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... xisting provisions of section 35(1)(ii) provide for a weighted deduction from business income to the extent of 125 per cent of any sum paid to an approved and notified scientific research association or to a university, college or other institution to be utilized for scientific research. Section 35(1)(iii) provides similar deduction if the sum is paid to an approved and notified university, college or other institution to be used to carry on research in social science or statistical research. Section 80GGA allows deductions for donations made to such association, universities, etc. Under section 10(21), exemption is granted in respect of the income of a scientific research association which is approved and notified under section 35(1)(ii). The university, college or other institutions which are approved either under section 35(1)(ii) or under section 35(1)(iii) also qualify for exemption of their income under section 10(23C) of the Act subject to specified conditions. The associations which are engaged in undertaking research in social science or statistical research are not currently covered by the provisions of section 35(1)(iii). Such research associations are also not entitled ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of the specified business for any assessment year, no deduction shall be allowed under the provisions of Chapter VI-A under the heading "C.-Deductions in respect of certain incomes" in relation to such specified business for the same or any other assessment year. A similar amendment is proposed in section 80A. These amendments are proposed to take effect from 1st April, 2011 and will, accordingly, apply in relation to the assessment year 2011-12 and subsequent years. One of the conditions for availing the benefit under section 35AD in the case of laying and operating a cross-country natural gas or crude or petroleum oil pipeline network for distribution, including storage facilities being an integral part of such network, is that the specified business 'has made not less than one-third of its total pipeline capacity available for use on common carrier basis by any person other than the assessee or an associated person'. The Petroleum Natural Gas Regulatory Board has, by regulations, specified a common carrier capacity condition of 'one-third' for a natural gas pipeline network and 'one-fourth' for petroleum product pipeline network. In order to rationalise the existing condition re ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... if the gross receipts in profession exceed ten lakh rupees in the previous year. In order to reduce compliance burden of small businesses and professionals, it is proposed to increase the aforesaid threshold limit from forty lakh rupees to sixty lakh rupees in the case of persons carrying on business and from ten lakh rupees to fifteen lakh rupees in the case of persons carrying on profession. B. In view of the amendment proposed above, it is also proposed to increase the maximum penalty, leviable under section 271B for failure to get accounts audited under section 44AB or to furnish a report of such audit, from one lakh rupees to one lakh fifty thousand rupees. C. It is also proposed that for the purpose of presumptive taxation under section 44AD, the threshold limit of total turnover or gross receipts would be increased from forty lakh rupees to sixty lakh rupees. These amendments are proposed to take effect from 1st April, 2011 and will, accordingly, apply in relation to the assessment year 2011-12 and subsequent years. [Clauses 14, 15, 50] Income of a non-resident providing services or facilities in connection with prospecting for, or extraction or production of, mineral oil U ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ordingly, apply in relation to the assessment year 2011-12 and subsequent years. [Clauses 16, 17] Conversion of a private company or an unlisted public company into a limited liability partnership (LLP) The Finance (No. 2) Act, 2009 provided for the taxation of LLPs in the Income-tax Act on the same lines as applicable to partnership firms. Section 56 and section 57 of the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 allow conversion of a private company or an unlisted public company (hereafter referred as company) into an LLP. Under the existing provisions of Income-tax Act, conversion of a company into an LLP has definite tax implications. Transfer of assets on conversion attracts levy of capital gains tax. Similarly, carry forward of losses and of unabsorbed depreciation is not available to the successor LLP. It is proposed that the transfer of assets on conversion of a company into an LLP in accordance with section 56 and section 57 of the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 shall not be regarded as a transfer for the purposes of capital gains tax under section 45, subject to certain conditions. These conditions are as follows: (i) the total sales, turnover or gross receipts in ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... section 56(2)(vii), any sum of money or any property in kind which is received without consideration or for inadequate consideration (in excess of the prescribed limit of Rs. 50,000/-) by an individual or an HUF is chargeable to income tax in the hands of recipient under the head 'income from other sources'. However, receipts from relatives or on the occasion of marriage or under a will are outside the scope of this provision. The existing definition of property for the purposes of section 56(2)(vii) includes immovable property being land or building or both, shares and securities, jewellery, archeological collection, drawings, paintings, sculpture or any work of art. A. These are anti-abuse provisions which are currently applicable only if an individual or an HUF is the recipient. Therefore, transfer of shares of a company to a firm or a company, instead of an individual or an HUF, without consideration or at a price lower than the fair market value does not attract the anti-abuse provision In order to prevent the practice of transferring unlisted shares at prices much below their fair market value, it is proposed to amend section 56 to also include within its ambit transactions ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... etrospectively from 1st October, 2009 and will, accordingly, apply in relation to the assessment year 2010-11 and subsequent years. D. It is proposed to amend the definition of 'property' as provided under section 56 so as to include transactions in respect of 'bullion'. This amendment is proposed to take effect from 1st June, 2010 and will, accordingly, apply in relation to the assessment year 2011-12 and subsequent years. E. It is proposed to amend section 142A(1) to allow the Assessing Officer to make a reference to the Valuation Officer for an estimate of the value of property for the purposes of section 56(2). This amendment is proposed to take effect from 1st July, 2010. [Clauses 3, 20, 21, 33] Deduction in respect of long-term infrastructure bonds In tune with the policy thrust of promoting investment in the infrastructure sector, it is proposed to insert a new section 80CCF in the Income-tax Act to provide that subscription during the financial year 2010-11 made to long-term infrastructure bonds (as may be notified by the Central Government), to the extent of Rs. 20,000, shall be allowed as deduction in computing the income of an individual or a Hindu undivided family. This ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he section, from the existing 4 years to 5 years from the end of the financial year in which the housing project is approved by the local authority. This extension will be available for housing projects approved on or after 1.4. 2005. Further, it is also proposed to enhance the current norms for built-up area of shops and other commercial establishments in housing projects in order to enable basic facilities for the residents. The built-up area of the shops and other commercial establishments included in the housing project is proposed to be three per cent of the aggregate built-up area of the housing project or 5000 sq. ft., whichever is higher. This benefit will be available to projects approved on or after the 1.4.2005, which are pending for completion, in respect of their income relating to assessment year 2010-11 and subsequent years. These amendments are proposed to take effect retrospectively from 1st April, 2010 and will, accordingly, apply in relation to the assessment year 2010-11 and subsequent years. [Clause 27] Deduction of profits of a hotel or a convention centre in the National Capital Territory Section 80-ID of the Income-tax Act provides for 100 per cent deduction ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... es in the processing of returns may need to be added to make it a complete end-to-end process. Therefore, it is proposed to extend the time limit for issue of such notification under section 143 (1B) from 31st March, 2010 to 31st March 2011. Consequential amendments on similar lines are proposed to be made in section 115WE of the Income-tax Act. These amendments are proposed to take effect retrospectively from 1st April, 2010. [Clauses 31, 34] Rationalisation of provisions relating to Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) Under the scheme of deduction of tax at source as provided in the Income-tax Act, every person responsible for payment of any specified sum to any person is required to deduct tax at source at the prescribed rate and deposit it with the Central Government within the specified time. However, no deduction is required to be made if the payments do not exceed prescribed threshold limits. In order to adjust for inflation and also to reduce the compliance burden of deductors and taxpayers, it is proposed to raise the threshold limit for payments mentioned in sections 194B, 194BB, 194C, 194D, 194H, 194-I and 194J as under: Sl. No. Section Nature of payment Existing threshold Pro ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ulting from search or as a result of requisition of books of account or other documents or any assets, within the definition of a "case" which can be admitted by the Settlement Commission. It is also proposed to amend the Explanation to section 245A(b) to specify the date on which the proceedings for assessment or reassessment shall be deemed to have commenced and concluded in the case of a person whose income is being assessed or reassessed as a result of search or as a result of requisition of books of account or other documents or any assets. Similarly, consequential amendments are also proposed to be made in section 22A of the Wealth-tax Act. These amendments are proposed to take effect from 1st June, 2010. B. Under the existing provisions of section 245C of the Income-tax Act, an application can be filed before the Settlement Commission, if the additional amount of income-tax payable on the income disclosed in the application exceeds three lakh rupees. It is proposed to substitute the proviso to section 245C, so as to provide that an application can be filed before the Settlement Commission, in cases where proceedings for assessment or reassessment have been initiated as a res ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... that the High Court may admit an appeal after the expiry of the period of one hundred and twenty days, if it is satisfied that there was sufficient cause for not filing the appeal within such period. Consequential amendments on similar lines are proposed to be made in section 27A of the Wealth-tax Act. These amendments are proposed to take effect retrospectively from 1st October, 1998. B. Under section 256 of the Income-tax Act, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal could to refer a case to the High Court. In case where the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal refused to refer a case to the High Court, the assessee or the Commissioner were allowed to file an appeal before the High Court against such refusal of the Tribunal within a period of six months from the date on which he was served with an order of refusal. It is proposed to retrospectively insert sub-section (2A) in section 256 so as to empower the High Court to admit an application after the expiry of the period of six months, if it is satisfied that there was sufficient cause for not filing the same within such period. Consequential amendments on similar lines are also proposed to be made in section 27 of the Wealth-tax Act. These ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|