9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (10) TMI 673X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... w of this, this is not a case for total waiver. The appellant are, therefore, directed to deposit an amount of Rs.1,00,000 towards penalty within a period of 4 weeks from the date of this order - Decided against assessee. - C/2964/2012- CU[SM] - STAY ORDER No. SO/58016/2013 - Dated:- 17-6-2013 - Sh. Rakesh Kumar, J. For the Appellant: Sh.Jitender Singh, Consltant For the Respondent: M ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... give his address or any other details. The seized goods have not been claimed by nobody. In view of these circumstances after issue of Show Cause Notice, Commissioner Customs, Lucknow vide order-in-original dt. 06.07.2012 ordered confiscation of seized goods and imposed penalty of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees ten lakh only) on the appellant under section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962. Against this order ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... appeal and recovery thereof may be stayed till disposal of the appeal. 4. Ms. Ranjana Jha, ld. departmental representative, opposed the stay application and pleaded that the while appellant admitting that these seized goods have been booked by him, has not disclosed the full address of the person to whom the goods belonged and in these circumstances the penalty has been correctly imposed on appe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
