2013 (10) TMI 808

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... usion of one court does not bind to other court for no provision in law in that regard. Therefore, Customs Act, 1962 deals with consequence on its own merit without mechanical adoption of vigilance inquiry observations. If the present application is entertained it shall amount to review of the order dated 10/1/13 which is not permissible in law. Tribunal having no power to review and it become fun .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 13 as stated in para 4 of the miscellaneous application No. 56620 dated 21/2/2013 certainly deserve consideration in the light of judgment of Apex Court in the case of J.K. Synthetics Ltd. vs. CCE - 1996 (86) E.L.T. 472 (S.C.). But to accommodate such situation even the appellant is absent today through his advocate who had filed the application for recall of the order. 2. There is no scope to r .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X