9911796707
TMI Blog1997 (2) TMI 501X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... eneral Sales Tax Act, 1958 (for short, "the Act"). It was assessed for the years 1982-83 to 1986-87. However, the respondent No. 1 issued notice (annexure P1) under section 19(1) of the Act to the petitioner stating that there are reasons to believe that certain transactions liable to tax during the aforesaid period have escaped assessment rendering the petitioner liable to be reassessed as also liable to penalty. This notice was challenged by the petitioner in M.P. No. 1208 of 1990 [Milan Supari Stores v. Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax [1994] 95 STC 165 (MP)] on the fulcrum of want of jurisdiction. The petition was resisted by the respondents who asserted that the specified authority has investigated the matter, collected details an ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed March 27, 1996 holding that there is material available to show that there has been sale and purchase of goods in Madhya Pradesh by the petitioner which has escaped assessment and as such the respondent had jurisdiction to proceed with the proposed reassessment in terms of section 19(1) of the Act. It is this order (annexure P4) of respondent No. 1 which is under challenge in the present petition. 5.. It is averred by the petitioner that the material relied upon by the respondent No. 1 does not disclose or establish any sale/purchase within the territory of Madhya Pradesh and the respondent No. 1, therefore, did not acquire any jurisdiction to initiate assessment proceedings under section 19(1) of the Act. As against it, the respondent ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ome sale or purchase of goods within the State of M.P. any time during 5 years preceding the assessment; and two: that such transaction has either been under-assessed or escaped assessment or assessed at a lower rate. In the instant case, however, the respondent No. 1 on the basis of material made available to him was satisfied that there existed grounds for proceeding under section 19(1). That being so, this Court cannot enter into the merits of the material and come to its own conclusions. Section 19(1) itself contemplates hearing of the dealer and enquiry by the taxing authority before any such assessment can be made or penalty imposed. The petitioner would surely be free at such hearing and enquiry to demonstrate that there has been n ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to by-pass the alternative remedy provided by statute. Surely matters involving the revenue where statutory remedies are available are not such matters. The Supreme Court can take judicial notice of the fact that the vast majority of the petitions under article 226 of the Constitution are filed solely for the purpose of obtaining interim orders and thereafter prolong the proceedings by one device or the other. The practice needs to be strongly discouraged." 9.. The petition in hand also seems to have been filed only with a view to circumvent statutory procedure and avoid assessment. This petition must, therefore, fail and is accordingly dismissed with costs Rs. 500 to be adjusted from the amount of security. The remaining amount of secur ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
