9911796707
TMI Blog1998 (3) TMI 645X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... essment first and then demand the tax due from the petitioner. The facts are as follows: 2.. The petitioner was carrying on business in lottery tickets in the name and style of Elangovan Lottery Centre for only 6 months from July, 1992 to December, 1992. The petitioner is not a registered dealer under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act. The business premises was inspected by the Enforcement ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ust 21, 1992 relating to the date of inspection and admitted a certain irregularities. A notice based on the recovery of slips was issued to the dealer at his business address 37, Motilal Street, T. Nagar, Chennai-17. There is an endorsement in the notice dated November 5, 1993 to the effect that the dealer had vacated the premises and therefore the notice was sent by registered post to the reside ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to the petitioner to his residential address. The cover has been returned unserved. 4.. Under the above circumstances, the question is whether the petitioner has been served with notice prior to assessment in accordance with rule 52 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Rules, 1959. It is not necessary for me to quote the entire rule. Suffice to point out that the several modes prescribed in the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rained to set aside the order of assessment dated April 28, 1995 made in Rc. No. 2191/92-93 as being in violation of the principles of natural justice and statutory rules. The said order is accordingly quashed. The respondent is directed to give a fresh opportunity to the petitioner and then proceed in accordance with law. Consequently the impugned demand notice dated January 12, 1998 shall not be ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
