TMI Blog2013 (11) TMI 1085X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ar factory – Relying upon Saraswati Sugar Mills Vs. CCE, Delhi-III [2011 (8) TMI 4 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] - The applicants directed to deposit Rupees thirty lakhs as pre-deposit – upon such submission rest of the duty to be waived till the disposal – Partial stay granted. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Saraswati Sugar Mills Vs. CCE, Delhi-III 2011 (270) ELT 465 (S.C), decided the issue against the applicants. 4. The Ld. Advocate submits that the demand is partially barred by limitation. He fairly submits that the normal period works out about Rs. 27 lakhs approximately. 5. After considering the submissions of both sides, we direct the applicants to de ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|