9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (11) TMI 1240X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e Income-tax Act, 1961 is bad in law. 3. That the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Chandigarh is not justified in upholding the order of the ld. Assessing Officer wherein the whole of the Long Term Capital Gains of Rs. 78,63,408/- has been made taxable during the year under consideration as there has been no Transfer of such Property by the appellant under the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and Transfer of Property Act, 1882, during the year under consideration. This addition of Rs. 78,63,408/- being made on estimation, surmises and conjectures is uncalled for and deserves to be deleted. 4. That the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Chandigarh is not justified in upholding the order of the ld. Assessing Officer as the appellant has correctly offered a sum of Rs. 19,20,000/- under the head Capital Gains for taxation as only a part of the property was transferred during the year under consideration as per the terms and condition of the agreement dated 27-04-2007 and taxing the whole of the Long Term Capital Gains of Rs. 78,63,408/- is unjustified. 5. That the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is not justified in upholding the order ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ry consideration and a furnished flat measuring 1350 sqft which has been valued at Rs. 4500 per sqft. at Rs. 60,75,000/-. Whole of the consideration amounting to Rs. 1,08,75,000/- has been subjected to charge of capital gain. This issue has been considered by us in detail in case of Shri Charanjit Singh Atwal (supra). The issue has been decided vide paras 27 to 110 which are as under: 27 We have considered the rival submissions and carefully gone through the written submissions filed by both the parties in the light of material on record, paper books and various judgments cited by the parties. The main issue is whether assessee is liable to capital gain tax in the year under consideration i.e. assessment year 2007-08 in view of the JDA. For charging capital gains, the charging section is 45 and the relevant portion is as under: Section 45. (1) Any profits or gains arising from the transfer of a capital asset effected in the previous year shall, save as otherwise provided in sections 54, 54B, 54D, 54E, 54EA, 54EB, 54F 54G and 54H, be chargeable to income-tax under the head "Capital gains", and shall be deemed to be the income of the previous year in which the transfe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... operty to be taken or retained in part performance of a contract of the nature referred to in section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (4 of 1882) ; or (vi) any transaction (whether by way of becoming a member of, or acquiring shares in, a co-operative society, company or other association of persons or by way of any agreement or any arrangement or in any other manner whatsoever) which has the effect of transferring, or enabling the enjoyment of, any immovable property. Explanation. For the purposes of sub-clauses (v) and (vi), "immovable property" shall have the same meaning as in clause (d) of section 269UA; Clauses (v) (vi) to section 2(47) of the Act have been inserted by Finance Act, 1987 w.e.f. 1.4.1988. The purpose of this insertion has been explained by CBDT in Circular No. 495 dated 22.9.1987. The relevant part 11.1 and 11.2 of the circular reads as under: "11.1 The existing definition of the word "transfer" in section 2(47) does not include transfer of certain rights accruing to a purchaser, by way of becoming a member or acquiring shares in a co-operative society, company, or as way of any agreement or any arrangement whereby such ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ken from the Government / DDA and transferor was required to pay 50% of the market value - cost (i.e. unearned increase) to the Government. To avoid such payments and/or also to avoid the payment of stamp duty or cumbersome procedure of obtaining permission, some properties were being sold by way of sale agreement and also execution of General Power of Attorney and possession was given on receipt of full consideration without executing the proper sale deeds etc. which as mentioned earlier was not even permissible in some cases. These transactions are popularly called "power of attorney" transactions. To avoid these and to stop the leakage of Revenue, the Parliament has inserted clauses (v) (vi) to section 2(47) so as such type of transactions are also be brought into taxation net. However, interpretations of these clauses has led to lot of litigation and the main point of litigation was that at what point of time the possession can be said to have been given. In the present case, the Revenue has mainly relied on two decisions namely (i) Chaturbhuj Dwarkadas Kapadia v CIT 260 ITR 491 (Bom.) and; (ii) Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) New Delhi in the case of Jasbir Singh Sarkaria ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... effect from April 1, 1988. They provide that "transfer " includes (i) any transaction which allows possession to be taken/retained in part performance of a contract of the nature referred to in section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and (ii) any transaction entered into in any manner which has the effect of transferring or enabling the enjoyment of any immovable property. Therefore, in these two cases capital gains would be taxable in the year in which such transactions are entered into, even if the transfer of the immovable property is not effective or complete under the general law. Under section 2(47)(v) any transaction involving allowing of possession to be taken over or retained in part performance of a contract of the nature referred to in section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act would come within the ambit of section 2(47)(v). In order to attract section 53A, the following conditions need to be fulfilled. There should be a contract for consideration ; it should be in writing ; it should be signed by the transferor ; it should pertain to transfer of immovable property ; the transferee should have taken possession of the property ; lastly, the transferee should ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... actice of Income-tax-VIII edition, page 766) . This test is important to decide the year of chargeability of the capital gains." 35 The above observations were made on the basis of opinion expressed by Ld. author in the commentary - "The Law and Practice of Income Tax by Kanga and Palkhivala Eighth Edition at page 766. Relevant observations read as under: "Cls. (v) and (vi) of s. 2(47), inserted by the Finance Act 1987 with effect from 1st April 1988, provide that "transfer" includes (a) any transaction which involves the allowing of the possession of an immovable property (s. 269UA(d)) to be taken or retained in part performance of a contract of the nature referred to in s.53A of the transfer of Property Act 1882, and (b) any transaction entered into in any manner which has the effect of transferring, or enabling the enjoyment of, any immovable property (s. 269UA(d)). Therefore in these two cases capital gains would be taxable in the year in which such transactions are entered into, even if the transfer of the immovable property is not effective or complete under general law." 36 From the above, it is clear that Court was of the view that in case any transacti ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nt have come to the conclusion that the transfer took place during the accounting year ending March 31,1996, as substantial payments were effected during that year and substantial permissions were obtained. In such cases of development agreements, one cannot go by substantial performance of a contract. In such cases, the year of chargeability is the year in which the contract is executed. This is in view of section 2 (47)(v) of the Act." Secondly it is mentioned in the order of the Court that law was not very clear on this point and since the assessee has admitted and paid capital gain in the Assessment year 1999-2000, therefore, tax was held to be chargeable in Assessment year 1999-2000. Thirdly certain shortcomings were also noted in the order of the Tribunal where certain documents were mentioned to have been executed before March 31, 1996 e.g. the following observation of the Tribunal was not found correct as something is done on Ist April, 1997 then the same cannot fall in the year ending 31.3.1996. "From the dates it is evident that from the very next day, i.e., April 1, 1997, from the end of the financial year ending on March 31, 1996, the builder was us ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ential complex through developer and entered into a Collaboration agreement on 8.6.2005 with M/s Santur Developer Pvt Ltd. New Delhi (hereinafter called 'Developer'). According to the terms of agreement, the Developer should obtain a letter of intent from the concerned government department and obtain other permissions and sanctions for developing the land at its own risk and cost. The Developer was to take 84% of the builtup area and balance 16% would belong to assessee and other co-owner. The consideration for the agreement was taken as the builtup area to be handedover to the owners free of cost. The owners were entitled to visit the site in order to review the progress of the project. It was clarified by clause 18 that ownership would remain exclusively with the owners till it vests with both the parties as per their respective shares on the completion of the project. The other clauses and the steps in the agreement were that a sum of Rs. 1 crore towards payment of earnest money at the time of entering into agreement; a special power of attorney was to be executed in favour of the Developer to enable to deal with the Statutory authorities etc. for obtaining necessary approvals/ ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... expression "accrue" are used in the Income-tax Act either collectively or separately according to the context and nature of the charging provision. The second point which deserves notice is that by a deeming provision, the profits or gains that have arisen would be treated as the income of the previous year in which the transfer took place. That means, the income on account of arisal of capital gain should be charged to tax in the same previous year in which the transfer was effected or deemed to have taken place. The effect and ambit of the deeming provision contained in section 45 has been considered in decided cases and leading text books. The following statement of law in Sampath Iyengar's Commentary (10th Edition- Revised by Shri S. Rajaratnam) brings out the correct legal position : "Section 45 enacts that the capital gains shall by fiction 'be deemed to be the income of the previous year in which the transfer took place'. Since this is a statutory fiction, the actual year in which the sale price was received, whether it was one year, two years, three years, four years etc. previous to the previous year of transfer, is beside the point. The entirety of the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Sarkaria J. in Superintendent and Remembrance of Legal Affairs, W. B. v. Anil Kumar Bhunja [1979] 4 SCC 274 and as a word of "open texture" (see Salmond on Jurisprudence, paragraph 51, Twelfth Edition, Indian reprint). Salmond observed : "to look for a definition that will summarize the meanings of the term "possession" in ordinary language, in all areas of law and in all legal systems, is to ask for the impossible". In the above case of Anil Kumar Bhunja [1979] 4 SCC 274, Sarkaria J. speaking for a three-judge Bench also referred to the comments of Dias and Hughes in their book on Jurisprudence that "if a topic ever suffered too much theorizing it is that of 'possession'". Much of the difficulty is caused by the fact that possession is not a pure legal concept, as pointed out by Salmond. The learned judge then explained the connotation of the expression "possession" by referring to the well known treatises on jurisprudence (page 278) : " 'Possession', implies a right and a fact : the right to enjoy annexed to the right to property and the fact of the real intention. It involves power of control and intent to control, (see Dias and Hughes) 14 ------------- ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... property to oversee the development work or to ensure performance of the terms of agreement does not introduce any incompatibility. The concurrent possession of the owner who can exercise possessory rights to a limited extent and for a limited purpose and that of the buyer/developer who has a general control and custody of the land can very well be reconciled. Clause (v) of section 2(47) will have its full play even in such a situation. There is no warrant to postpone the operation of clause (v) and the resultant accrual of capital gain to a point of time when the concurrent possession will become exclusive possession of developer/transferee after he pays full consideration. Further, if "possession" referred to in clause (v) is to be understood as exclusive possession of the transferee/developer, then, the very purpose of the amendment expanding the definition of transfer for the purpose of capital gains may be defeated. The reason is this: the owner of the property can very well contend, as is being contended in the present case, that the developer will have such exclusive possession in his own right only after the entire amount is paid to the owner to the last pie. Ther ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ent work could not be commenced for want of certain approvals, and therefore, the developer was "not willing to take possession of the land". Such an unsubstantiated statement which is not found in the original application or even written submissions filed earlier need not be probed into especially when it is not his case that the developer was not allowed to take possession in terms of the agreement." 42. After the above discussion, the Authority discussed the facts of the case before it. It was observed that paragraph 18 of the Collaboration Agreement provides that on issuance of letter of intent, the owners will allow and permit the Developer to enter upon and survey the land, erect site/sales office, carry out the site development work and do activities for advancing sale promotion, construction etc. The Authority further observed that if this clause is read in isolation this would suggest on passing of possession but according to Authority the other factors are to be considered. Clause 15 provided that on fulfilment of the requirements laid down in the letter of intent which is provisional license, the owners should execute an irrevocable general power of attorney in f ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... is on a higher pedestal than a developer who apportions built up area with the owner. Even if he is an agent in one sense in the course of developing the land, that agency is coupled with interest. For these reasons, the prefix "irrevocable" is deliberately chosen. As discussed earlier, the owner's limited right to enter the land and oversee the development work is not incompatible with the developer's right of control over the land which he derives from the GPA. Exclusive possession, as already pointed out, is not necessary for the purpose of satisfying the ingredients of clause (v) of section 2(47). We are therefore, of the view that the irrevocable GPA executed by the owners in favour of the developer must be regarded as a transaction in the eye of law which allows possession to be taken in part performance of the contract for transfer of the property in question...." 43. Thus, the above clearly shows that irrevocable general power of attorney which leads to overall control of the property in the hands of the Developer, even if that means no exclusive possession by the Developer would constitute transfer. It can be said that it has to be construed as 'possession' in terms ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ve taken place on the date of execution of such GPA. The irrevocable GPA was executed on May 8, 2006, i.e., during the previous year relevant to the assessment year 2007-08 and the capital gains must be held to have arisen during that year. Incidentally, it may be mentioned that during the said year, i.e., financial year 2006-07, a final license was granted and the applicant/owners received nearly 2/3rds of the consideration. " 45. Legal position has been discussed in abovenoted paras and now let us discuss the facts of the case in the light of abovenoted legal position. 46 Undisputed facts of the case are that the assessee is a Member of Punjabi Cooperative House Building Society Ltd. which had 96 members (Number of members were stated as 95 during arguments but clause 13 of the JDA refers to number of members as 96). The Society was owning 21.2 acres of land in village Kansal Distt. Mohali adjacent to Chandigarh. There were two types of members firstly the members who were owning plot of 500 sqyd and secondly the members who are holding plot of 1000 sqyd. Somewhere in 2006 it was decided to develop a Group Housing commercial project and do development as per the appli ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f the Society dated 4.1.2007 as well as resolution of the General Body Meeting of the Society dated 25.2.2007 were made part of JDA by way of annexure. The Society agreed to execute an irrevocable Special Power of Attorney in favour of THDC and all other necessary documents, at the request of the developers. 47 In clause 1 of JDA various expressions have been defined. Clause 2 describes the project as under: "2.1 The owner hereby irrevocably and unequivocally grants and assigns in perpetuity all its rights to develop, construct, mortgage, lease, license, sell and transfer the property along with any and all the construction, premises, hereditaments, easements, trees thereon in favour of THDC for the purpose of development, construction, mortgage, sale, transfer, lease, license and or exploitation for full utilization of the Property (Rights) and to execute all the documents necessary to carry out, facilitate and enforce the Rights in the Property including to execute Lease Agreement, License Agreements, Construction Contracts, Supplier Contracts, Agreement for sale, Conveyance, Mortgage Deeds, finance documents and all documents and agreements necessary to create and re ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on receipt of Payment as set out in Clause 4.1 above, execute an irrevocable Special Power of Attorney to THDC for development of the property authorizing THDC to do all lawful acts, deeds, matters and things pertaining to the development of the property for the project along with inter alia right to mortgage the property and/or premises, sell, lease, license the premises and receive/collect monies in its name in respect of the same and approach interact, communicate with the Competent authorities and for doing all acts, deeds, matters and things to be done or incurred by THDC in that behalf as also to sign all letters, applications, agreements and register the same if necessary, documents, court proceedings, affidavits and such other papers containing true facts and correct particulars as made from time to time be required in this behalf. 9.2 The owner shall execute in favour of THDC the sale deed is in accordance with the provisions of clause 4.1(ii) to Clause 4.1(iv) of this Agreement and execute all other necessary documents and papers to complete the aforesaid transaction. 9.3 That all the original title deeds pertaining to property as mentioned in Annexure IV has ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rding to him as per clause 2.1 of the JDA the possession of the property was to be handedover simultaneously to the execution and registration of JDA and since the JDA was not registered, therefore, the possession was not given. We can not accept this contention because in "Power of Attorney" transactions, it is not necessary to register the JDA if a special Power of Attorney has been given and same is registered. Secondly clause 9.3 of the JDA as reproduced above clearly show that original title deed which have been mentioned along with the possession in para 2.1 which according to the ld. counsel of the assessee were to be handedover simultaneously to execution and registration of the JDA, is not correct because clause 9.3 clearly mention that original title deed of the property have been handedover to the THDC at the time of signing of this agreement because clause 9.3 there is no mention about registration of JDA. 54. Special Power of Attorney which has been executed on 26.2.2007 and has been registered also. The irrevocable special Power of Attorney has been executed as provided in clause 6.7 of the JDA which reads as under: "6.7 The Owner shall execute an irrevoca ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... such a part or portion in such authority and to admit execution thereof before the concerned Competent Authority and get the same registered with the concerned sub-registrar. (y) Reasonable opportunity of hearing shall be given to mortgage, encumber or create a charge on the Property or any part or portion thereof and execute the necessary security documents in favour of any bank /financial institution to raise funds for the construction/development of the Property and for the said purpose to deposit title deeds (if required) in respect of the Property in favour of such bank/financial institution, execute the necessary documents and register the charge created on the Property if so required in the revenue records and/or desired by the Attorney. (aa) To sell, transfer , lease, license the Premises that may be constructed on the Property on ownership basis, lease, license and/or in any other manner for such price as the Attorneys may deem fit and proper. To collect and receive from the purchased, transferees, lessees, licensees of the Premises, monies/price and/or consideration and/or maintenance charges and to sign and execute and/or give proper and lawful discharge fo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rviving which clearly shows that developer continues to be in possession for the purpose of development, mortgage etc. even after termination. Clause 8 which describes the obligation and undertaking of the THDC/HASH and provides specifically that all environmental clearance shall be obtained by THDC/HASH out of its own sources. Thus it was clearly understood by the parties that requisite environmental clearances had to be obtained before start of the project. Clause 10 again casts specific obligation on the owner Society to give consent to THDC/HASH to raise finance for the development and completion of the project on the Security of the property by way of mortgaging the property. Thus whatever power/authorization have been given through irrevocable special Power of Attorney are emanating from the terms and conditions agreed to among the parties from the JDA. 55. The combined reading of the above clauses of the Irrevocable Special Power of Attorney and JDA clearly show that the developer was authorized to enter upon the property for not only for the purpose of development but other purposes also. THDC was authorized to amalgamate the project with any other project in the adja ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... case of Jasbir Singh Sarkaria (supra) which we have reproduced above, it becomes clear that the possession has been given. 56 In that discussion, it has been clearly mentioned that the position contemplated by clause (v) of section 2(47) of the Act need not to be exclusive possession. What is required is that the transferee by virtue of possession should be able to exercise control from overall intended purposes. We do not think in the present case the assessee has given only a license as claimed by ld. counsel of the assessee because of the powers of selling, amalgamating etc. mentioned in the JDA and irrevocable Special Power of Attorney. The issue has been discussed in the judgment of Jasbir Singh Sarkaria (supra) in further discussion which has been made in para 33 regarding Power of Attorney (which has been reproduced earlier). In that case the powers were given to enter upon and survey the land, prepare lay out plans, submit building plan for sanction with the appropriate authorities to control, manage and look after and supervise the property, to obtain water and sewerage, disposal and electricity connection. In that case the developer was authorized to mortgage the pr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er would get defeated. We are reproducing following headnote of the Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Dr. Baliram Waman Hiray v. Mr. Justice B. Lentin and another (supra) : "The following principles enunciated in Heydon"s case (1584) 3 Co. Rep 7a and firmly established, are still in full force and effect: "that for the sure and true interpretation of all statutes in generals (be they penal or beneficial, restrictive or enlarging of the common law), four things are to be discerned and considered: (1) what was the common law before the making of the Act; (2) what was the mischief and defect for which the common law did not provide; (3) what remedy Parliament has resolved and appointed to cure the disease of the common wealth and (4) the true reason of the remedy. And then, the office of all the judges is always to make such construction as shall suppress the evasions for the continuance of the mischief and pro private commando and to add force and life to the cure and remedy according to the true intent of the makers of the Act pro bono public." There is now the further addition that regard must be had not only to the existing law but also to prior legislation and to the judicial i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t possession has also been discussed and following extract of paragraph 55 of Salmond's Jurisprudence has been extracted which reads as under: "It was a maxim of the civil law that two persons could not be in possession of the same thing at the same time. As a general proposition this is true: for exclusiveness is of the essence of possession. Two adverse claims of exclusive use cannot both be effectually realized at the same time. Claims, however, which are not adverse, and which are not, therefore, mutually destructive, admit of concurrent realization. Hence there are several possible cases of duplicate possession. 1. Mediate and immediate possession cross-objections-exist in respect of the same thing as already explained. 2. Two or more persons may possess the same thing in common; just as they may owe it in common. The concurrent possession of the owner who can exercise possession right to a limited extent and for a limited purpose and that of the buyer/developer who has a general control and custody of the land can very well be reconciled." 61. In further discussion in para 26 to 28 of the above decision it has been held that it is not nec ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ould like to discuss this aspect of the issue in little more detail and try to understand why the whole of the consideration is required to be taxed. At the cost of repetition let us again reproduce the observations of the Ld. authority in case of Jasbir Singh Sarkaria (supra) which we have earlier extracted at para 40 and the relevant portion is as under: "40. On the above, the Hon'ble Authority after referring to the provisions of section 45 and observed as under: "....The section can be analysed thus : (a) transfer of a capital asset effected in the previous year, (b) resultant profits or gains from such transfer, (c) those profits or gains would constitute the income of the assessee/ transferor (d) such income shall be deemed to be the income of the same previous year in which the transfer had taken place. Two aspects may be noted at this juncture. Firstly, the expression used is "arising" which is not to be equated with the expression "received". Both these expressions and in addition thereto, the expression "accrue" are used in the Income-tax Act either collectively or separately according to the context and n ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... radistinction to the word "receive" and indicate a right to receive. This was explained by Fry L.J., in Colquhoun v. Brooks. The learned judge observed: 'I think, therefore, that the words "arise or accruing" are general words descriptive of a right to receive profits.' See also CIT v. Anamallais Timber Trust Ltd. To attract the operation of section 12B it is therefore sufficient if the profits arose. They need not have been actually received." 14. Thus the criterion of right to receive the profits/gains was applied in that case. 15. The legal position does not therefore admit of any doubt that the actual receipt of the entire sale consideration during the year of "transfer" is not necessary for the purpose of computing capital gains." Further the expression arising has been defined in the Advanced Law Lexicon by P. Ramanatha Aiyer edited by Y.V. Chandrachud, Former Chief Justice of India: "The words "Arising or accruing" describe a right to receive profits, and that there must be a debt owed by somebody. Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax, West Bengal-II, Calcutta v. Hindustan Housing and Land Development Trust Ltd. AIR 1986 S.C 1805, 1807." The expr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the money which has been received by the assessee which is required to be taxed but the consideration which has accrued to the assessee is also required to be taxed. In view of this, this contention is rejected. 69. The fifth contention made by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee was that since section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act itself has undergone amendment w.e.f. 24.9.2001 by which the agreement referred to in that section is required to be registered and therefore, now in section 2(47)(v) only the amended provisions can be read. We find no force in this contention. It is well known that section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act was passed on equitable doctrine so as to protect the taking over or retention of the possession by the transferee. It was not a source by which title of immovable property could be acquired. Section 53A of TP Act read as under:- 53A. Part performance.- Where any person contracts to transfer for consideration any immovable property by writing signed by him or on his behalf from which the terms necessary to constitute the transfer can be ascertained with reasonable certainty, and the transferee has, in part performance of the co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... had referred to the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Surana Steels v. DCIT 237 ITR 777 (SC) for the proposition that when a section of a particular statute is introduced into another Act it must be read in the same sense as it bore in the original Act. The careful perusal of that judgment would show that situation is applicable only when a particular provision of an Act has been incorporated in the later Act. In that case a question arose that for the purpose of MAT provision what is the meaning of past losses or unabsorbed depreciation. It w as found that in Explanation to section 115J clause (iv) , the following expression was used:- "(iv) the amount of the loss or the amount of depreciation which would be required to be set off against the profit of the relevant previous year as if the provisions of clause (b) of the first proviso to sub-section (i) of section 205 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) are applicable. 71 The Hon'ble Apex Court referred to the Principles of Statutory Interpretation by Shri G.P. Singh and extracted following piece: "Section 115J, Explanation clause (iv), is a piece of legislation by incorporation. Dealing with the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... aw that any interpretation which could render a particular provision redundant should be avoided. If the contention of the ld. counsel was to be accepted, obviously the provisions of clause (v) of section 2(47) of the Act would become redundant in the sense that registration of agreement would again be made compulsory but since properties were being sold in the market on "power of attorney" basis through unregistered agreements which would make this provision redundant. This position we have already discussed earlier while discussing the Heydon's Rule in the interpretations of this clause. Further the issue of interpretation of clause (v) and amendment to section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act came for consideration before the Mumbai Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Suresh Chander Aggarwal v. ITO 48 SOT 2010. The Tribunal discussed this issue at page 7 and after quoting the provisions of section 2(47) and also section 53A before and after amendment as wall as para Nos. 11.1 to 11.2 of the Board's Circular No. 495 dated 22.9.1987 observed as under:- "The above clearly shows that there was certain situation where properties were being transferred without registration o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in the case of Podar Cement (P.) Ltd. (supra}. In that case, the assessee was owner of four flats in a building called "Silver Arch"/on Nepean Sea Road, Bombay. Out of these four flats, two were purchased directly from the Builders, Malabar Industries Pvt. Ltd., and two were purchased by its sister concerns which were later purchased by the assessee. The possession of the flats was taken after full payment of consideration. The flats were let out. The assessee contended that the rental income from these flats was assessable as "income from other sources" because the assessee was not the legal owner because the title of the property had not been conveyed to the Co-operative Society which was formed by the purchasers of the flats. The Hon'ble Court noted that section 27 had been amended vide clause 3(a) wherein when a person was allowed to take possession of the building in part performance of the nature referred to in section 53A, such person shall be deemed to be the owner. It was further observed that for all practicable purposes the assessee was the owner and possibly there cannot be two owners of same property at the same time. In fact, the amendments to section 27 were made la ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Income-tax Act the ground reality has to be recognized and if all the ingredients of transfer have been completed, then such transfer has to be recognized. Merely because the particular instrument of transfer has not been registered will not alter the situation. This position is further strengthened by the fact that legislature itself has inserted clause (v) to section 2(47) and while referring to the provisions of section 53A, reference has been made by stating that contracts in the nature of section 53A should also be covered by the definition of "transfer". Therefore, in our humble view, the amendment to sec. 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, whereby the requirement of the documents not being registered has been omitted, will not alter the situation for holding the transaction to be a transfer u/s.2(47)(v) if all other ingredients have been satisfied." 74. Thus, it is clear that non-registration of agreement cannot lead to the conclusion that provision of section 2(47) (v) is not applicable. Similar view has been taken by ITAT Cochin Bench of the Tribunal in case of G. Sreenivasan v. DCIT 28 Txmann.com 200 (Coch.) and ITAT Pune Bench in the case of Mahesh Nemichandra G ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... this case, similar observations were made, though it is not pointed out in what respect the transferee has failed to perform his part but it has been observed that the facts of the case shows that transferee has not performed his part of the contract. 80. The third judgment relied upon by the ld. Counsel for the assessee is in the case of DCIT v Tej Singh (supra). In that case land was acquired by the government and the matter went for litigation. During the pendency of litigation, the assessee entered into a Development agreement with a Developer for the purpose of development of the property, however, it was clarified in the agreement that there is litigation in respect of acquisition of property and the developer has to take clearance from the government in the matter of denotification of the land. It was held that since the land was under compulsory acquisition and no compensation has been received, therefore, there could not be any capital gain tax u/s 2(47)(iii) which deals with the compulsory acquisition. It was further observed that assessee could not have given possession unless and until the land was denotified. Since facts of the case are different than the case i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mean events of war, war like conditions, block ads, embargoes, insurrection, Governmental directions, riots, strikes, acts of terrorism, civil commotion, lock-outs, sabotage, plagues or other epidemics, acts of God including fire, floods, volcanic eruptions, typhoons, hurricanes, storms, tidal waves, earthquake, landslides, lightning, explosions and other natural calamities, prolonged failure of energy, court orders/injunctions, charge of laws, action and/or order by statutory and/or government authority, third party actions affecting the development of the Project, acquisition/requisition of the Property or any part thereof by the government or any other statutory authority and such circumstances affecting the development of the project (Event of Force Majeure). (iii) Any Party claiming restriction on the performance of any of its obligations under this agreement due to the happening or arising of an Event of Force Majeure hereof shall notify the other Party of the happening or arising and the ending of ceasing of such event or circumstance with three (3) days of determining that an Event of Force Majeure has occurred. In the event any Party anticipates the happening of an Event ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rity, perhaps, because of the interim order passed in the PIL which has been clarified by the Hon'ble Supreme Court by order dated 31.1.2012 permitting the concerned authority under the different statutes governing the matter to exercise their respective jurisdictions in accordance with law. Insofar as the Wild life ( Protection) Act is concerned, it appears that the rejection has been made by the Chief Wild Life Warden who, the respondents claim, is merely a recommending authority and is required to forward his recommendation to the Central Government. As the rejection under the Wild Life (Protection) Act has been made by an authority not competent to do, the promoters of the project have sought a review of the order which is still pending for the same reason(s) as noticed above. 4. On these facts we are of the view that it would be prudent on our part to take the view that the issue with regard to clearance/sanction under the two enactments i.e. Environment (Protection) Act and Wild life (Protection) Act is presently pending and as the promoters of the project have submitted themselves to the jurisdiction of the authorities under the said enactments we should refrain from a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... a contentious issue, and as we have already held that the process of grant of such clearances is pending before the appropriate authorities under the respective Acts, the same will now have to be brought to its logical conclusion keeping in mind our observations and directions contained hereinabove. 83. The combined reading of the above paras in the order of Hon'ble High Court clearly shows that Developer THDC/HASH i.e. transferee have made their sincere efforts for obtaining the necessary permissions/sanctions which were required under the JDA. However, some of the sanctions could not be taken in time because of the litigation by way of PIL but since none of the party was liable to the other party in view of the clause 26 dealing with FORCE MAJEURE it cannot be said that Developer was not willing to perform his part of contract. In any case no specific evidence has been shown us to prove that THDC/HASH were declining to perform particular obligation provided in JDA. In view of this discussion, it cannot be said that transferee i.e. Developer THDC/HASH is not willing to perform his part of contract. 84. Secondly, it was contended that payments have not been made as per ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... its part of the contract. In any case there is no default on the part of the developer as payment was not yet due as per clause 4(i)(iv) of JDA. 86 This position was informed to the Society by letter dated 4.2.2011 by HASH Builder, copy of which has been filed at pages 23 24 of the paper book dealing with the additional evidence. Through this letter it has been clearly stated that since permission is pending from the Ministry of Environment and Forest Department and therefore constructions could not commence. These permissions were pending because of the PIL filed by Shri Aalok Jagga before the Hon'ble Punjab Haryana High Court. All these facts clearly shows that in view of clause 4.1(iv) read with clause 26(v) of the JDA, HASH Builder were not required to make the payment and it cannot be said that they were not willing to perform their part of the contract on this aspect. Therefore, this contention is rejected. 87 Seventh contention is that revenue wrongly held that even clause (vi) of Section 2(47) is applicable. We find no force in this contention. Clause (vi) to Section 2(47) reads as under: "any transaction (whether by way of becoming a member of, or acc ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... detail at paras 64 to 68. 90 Second aspect of this contention was that if consideration which has not been received was to be taxed then the assessee would be deprived for claiming exemption u/s 54 and 54EC. As observed above as per Section 45 r.w.s 48 whole of the consideration, received or accrued has to be taxed. Every person is supposed to know the law and if the transaction is structured in such a way for the transfer of capital asset that some of the consideration would be received later then such person is supposed to know the consequences of the denial of such benefits. However , if the section is interpreted in the manner suggested by the ld. counsel of the assessee then no person would pay capital gain tax on transfer of a property. This will be clear from a simple example. Let us assume if "A" sells the property to "B" for a consideration of Rs. 100 crore and receive only a consideration of 1.00 crore and it is mentioned in the transfer instrument that balance of consideration would be paid after 20 years then no tax can be levied on such balance consideration of Rs. 99.00 crore which has not been received as per the contention of the ld. counsel of the assessee. B ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y might reasonably be expected to let from year to year; or (b) where the property or any part of the property is let and the actual rent received or receivable by the owner in respect thereof is in excess of the sum referred to in clause (a), the amount so received or receivable; or.... 92 On this aspect the settled position of the law is that the annual value has to be determined even if the property is not let out. This position has been discussed by the Ld. author Chaturvedi Pithisaria's in Commentary of Income Tax Law (fifth edition) Volume 1 in this respect at pages 1275 1276 observed as under: "Annual value- determination of - Section 23(1)(a) provides that for the purposes of section 22, the annual value of any property shall be deemed to be the sum for which the property might reasonably be expected to let from year to year. The word used is 'might' and not 'can' or 'is'. It is thus a notional income to be gathered from what a hypothetical tenant would pay which is to be objectively ascertained on a reasonable basis irrespective of the fact whether the property is let out or not [Sultan Bros. (P.) Ltd. v. CIT, [1964] 51 ITR 353 (SC); Jamnadas Pra ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... taxable income as per the provisions of the Act may be zero but still because of the Mat provisions, tax has to be charged on book profits. Similarly in the case of presumptive tax provisions e.g. u/s 44AD if a person is civil contractor and does not maintain books of account and his turnover is less than Rs. 60 lakhs then the profit would be presumed to be 8% of turnover even if he has suffered a loss. Another example of Section 2(22)(e) can be taken. Under this provision a loan or advance given by certain companies to a substantial shareholder is to be treated as deemed dividend. Such loan under the normal accounting principle or on commercial principles cannot be regarded as income but because of this specific provision regarding deemed dividend such amount has to be treated as income of the person receiving such loans. 95. The above position of law makes it absolutely clear that theory of real income is subject to the provisions of the Act and whenever any specific provisions of the Act is there for charging of a particular item of income, then the same has to be charged accordingly. It may be sometimes hard to the assessee's but again it has been held in numerous decisi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 25.02.2007 (copy attached as per Annexure I II), HASH is committed to pay to the Owner and/or the respective members of the Owner (as the case may be) a total amount of Rs. 106,42,50,000/- (Rupees One Hundred Six Crore Forty Two Lacs Fifty Thousands Only) calculated @ Rs. 82,50,000/- (Rupees Eighty Two Lacs Fifty Thousands Only) payable to 65 members having plot of 500 sq. yards each, Rs. 1,65,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore Sixty Five Lacs Only) payable to 30 members having plot of 1000 sq. yards each and Rs. 3,30,00,000/- (Rupees Three Crores Thirty Lacs Only) payable to the Owner for the 4 plots of 500 sq. yards each, which shall tantamount to the full and final payment to the Owner and / or the respective members of the Owner (as the case may be) in a manner set out herein below ('Payment'). Further, the transfer, sale and conveyance of 21.2 acres of land of the Property shall be made by the Owner in favour of THDC pro rata to the Payment received by the Owner and/or the respective members of the Owner (as the case may be) from HASH by executing sale deeds and registering the same. It is expressly provided that as resolved by the Owner, the total amount payable by HASH to the Owne ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rs having 1000 sqyd flat were entitled to receive two furnished flats. Thus upon execution of the JDA vested right came to such Members to receive such flats. Once this vested right arises out of the above contract it can easily be said that this right has also accrued to the assessee. Clause 4.2 makes it absolutely clear that developer i.e. THDC/HASH was to allot the letters of allotment within 45 days from final sanction from the competent authority and such flats were part of entire consideration. Merely because such allotment letter has not been given because of sanctions/permissions could not be obtained because of Public Interest Litigation before the Hon'ble Punjab Haryana High Court, it cannot be said that such right has not accrued. Though it may be hard on the assessee but it is well settled that taxation and equity are strangers. Further commenting on this aspect Shri Rajarathnam in his commentary has observed at page 5164 as under: "It is hard on the owners when required to pay tax, when handing over the possession for purposes of construction without being able to enjoy the construction, which is yet to commerce or in the process of construction being put up by ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 1.25 crore which was finally settled at Rs. 1.00 crore and the Tribunal held that the consideration of Rs. 1.00 crore has to be accepted. 102. From the above decision it is not clear whether in case of Kalaptaru Construction Oversees (P.) Ltd. (supra) which has been followed in above case, was concerning capital gain or not? Secondly it is not clear that whether the amended consideration i.e. settlement for Rs. 1.00 crore was made in the same year or not? As observed earlier while discussing the issue of notional income that provisions of section 45 r.w.s. 48, are absolutely clear and there is no ambiguity that once a capital asset is transferred then whole of the consideration received or accruing has to be considered for the purpose of taxation in the year in which the transfer has taken place. We further find that in the JDA there is a clause for termination of the agreement. Relevant clause 14 reads as under: "Termination "14(i) Save and except the provision of clause 26, THDC shall at all times have the right to terminate this Agreement in the event there is any material breach of the representations, warranties, undertakings, declarations, covenants and/or o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ts sale discretion terminate this Agreement. In the event the Agreement is terminated by THDC, all the lands registered in the name of THDC as per the terms of this Agreement up to the date of the termination shall remain with THDC and the balance lands to be transferred to THDC as per the terms of this Agreement shall not be transferred by the Owner in favour of THDC. Upon the termination, the Owner shall refund to THDC the Adjustable Advance/Earnest Money mentioned in clause 4.1(i) above within one month of such termination. In the event of failure of the Owner to refund the said amount, the Owner hereby agrees to execute a registered sale deed for land of equivalent value in favour of THDC. (iv) The owner shall have the right to terminate the Agreement only in the event of default by the Developers for making the Payment in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and the allotment of Flats within the time period as mentioned in this Agreement after giving Thirty (30) days written notice for rectification of such breach or any further time as may be desired by the Owner. In the event the Agreement is terminated by Owner, all the lands registered in the name of THDC as ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ent of THDC or any of its duly constituted attorneys." 104 The above clearly shows that this Power of Attorney could not be revoked for any reason without obtaining specific prior written consent of THDC/HASH. No document showing the consent of THDC for revocation of this irrevocable Power of Attorney has been produced before us. We fail to understand that in the absence of such document how the assessee can claim that this Power of Attorney has been revoked. As discussed earlier while considering the legal position, we would again recall the words of Hon'ble Authority for Advance Ruling in case of Jasbir Singh Sarkaria (supra) wherein at para 33 of the decision while discussing the issue in respect of Power of Attorney, it was highlighted that execution of irrevocable Power of Attorney is of significant nature and the words "irrevocable" are very important. The expression "irrevocable" itself shows that normally such attorney cannot be revoked. Therefore, no cognizance can be taken in respect of revocation of the irrevocable Power of Attorney. In the absence of specific consent as provided in clause 6.7 of the JDA from THDC. 105 We may also note that CIT D.R has pointed ou ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... obliged to file the return showing the entire capital gain based on the full sale price whether or not received during the year of deemed transfer. In such an eventuality, hardship may be caused to the owner who would have paid full tax. No doubt, such a situation could be avoided if the contention of the applicant is accepted. On deep consideration, however, we find that the construction of the relevant provision should not be controlled by giving undue importance to such hypothetical situations. Normally, the owner executes a Power of Attorney or does similar act to left the transferee take possession only after the basic permissions are granted and he is satisfied about the ability of transferee/developer to fulfil the contract. In spite of that, if such rate situations take place, the owner/transferor will not be without remedy. He can file a revised return and make out a case for exclusion or reduction of income. However, if the time-limit for filing a revised return expires, the difficulty will arise. It is for Parliament or the Central Government to provide a remedy to the assessee in such cases. Moreover, the other side of the picture as depicted in paragraph 27 (supra) sho ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pinion that either the JDA has not been cancelled or in any case the same cannot be considered for determining the taxation of capital gain. Accordingly this contention is rejected. 108 The next contention of the assessee is that even if the whole consideration has to be taxed then value of the flats cannot be taken at Rs. 4,500/- per sq. feet. It is also pointed out that in view of the agreement between the HASH THDC consideration has been shown at Rs. 2,000/- per sq. feet for 126 flats whereas it is Rs. 4,500/- per sq. feet for three flats. We find no force in these submissions. The assessee has filed along with the written submissions copy of the addendum of agreement between THDC and HASH by Joint Developer (at page 265 266) and this issue is discussed in clause 5 which is as under: "5. Clauses 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 on the page nos. 18 and 19 of the Agreement shall stand amended, modified and substituted by the following: 4.1 It is expressly agreed and understood by and between the Parties hereto (a) in the ratio of 72,28 between THDC and HASH in case Gross Sales Proceeds does not exceed Rs. 1272 crore; (b) in the ratio of 70: 30 between ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... any case was received or to be received later by the society in cash. Considering the present market value of the flats in and around Chandigarh area which is Rs. 4,000/- to 12,000/- per square feet we are of the opinion that value of the flat at Rs. 4,500/- per square feet is absolutely fair. In any case M/s HASH has agreed to purchase the flats at this rate from M/s THDC. It may be noted as pointed out by the ld. DR for the revenue some of the News report clippings filed by various assessees clearly shows that flats were booked in the "Tata Camleot" (this was the name which was given to the Project which was to be developed on the land of two societies) in the Pre Launch offer in the range of Rs. 7500 to 8000 per sqft. It is a common knowledge that rates in Pre Launch offer are lower than the rates when bookings open for the Public. Considering these facts we are of the opinion that Assessing Officer has estimated the value of the flats on most reasonable basis. In view of these observations this contention is rejected. 110 The Ld. Counsel for the assessee had made some submissions on the issue of deduction u/s 54F. He has pointed out that this issue has been rejected wro ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t were to receive monetary consideration of Rs. 1.65 crore plus two flats measuring 2250 sqft. In fact the payment of cheques is made by Hash by issuing cheques in the name of individual Member and not the Society. This fact stands admitted because assessee has filed a return declaring capital gain against part money received against his plot. Thus it becomes clear that it is the individual member who are liable to tax in respect of transfer to plots and the Society being only a facilitator or Post office. Some more details have been discussed in this respect while adjudicating the appeal of Punjabi Cooperative House Building Society Ltd. in ITA No. 310/Chd/2012 and 556/Chd/2012 which have been adjudicated little later in this order itself. Accordingly we find no force in the submissions and this ground is rejected." 9. In case of Punjabi Co-operative House Building Society Ltd. (supra) this issue was further considered vide paras 356 357 which are as under: "356 After considering the rival submissions we find that in the assessment order it has been observed by the Assessing Officer that to prevent leakage of revenue entire consideration of Rs. 234 crore consisting of m ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
