9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (11) TMI 1404X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... st audit of their premises done by Revenue. It is observed that appellants have filed the required periodical returns with the department showing the credit taken. It may be true that copies of the documents on the basis which credits are taken are not enclosed with the periodical returns filed with the department. But all the Cenvat credit taking documents are required to be seen by the Revenue d ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s stay application has been filed by the appellant against OIA No. PJ/66/VDR-II/2013-14 dated 08.05.2013. The issue involved in the present application is admissibility of Service Tax paid by the appellant on Jetty, Wharfage and Port Charges on import of their own cargo of Ammonia, when used in discharging Service Tax liability provided under Storage and Warehousing Services to M/s. Birla Copper ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mmissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur - [2011 (23) S.T.R. 385 (Tri.-Del.)] (b) Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore vs. M/s. MTR Foods Limited - [2011-TIOL-696-HC-KAR-CX] (c) Garrison Polysacks Pvt. Limited vs. Commissioner of ST, Vadodara-II- [2013 (292) ELT 513 (Tri. -Ahmd.)] 3. Sh. S. K. Mall (A.R.) appearing on behalf of the Revenue argued that in the self removal procedure under the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... es done by Revenue. It is observed that appellants have filed the required periodical returns with the department showing the credit taken. It may be true that copies of the documents on the basis which credits are taken are not enclosed with the periodical returns filed with the department. But all the Cenvat credit taking documents are required to be seen by the Revenue during audit exercise to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ceedings. Therefore, in the light of the aforesaid facts none of the other conditions prescribed in the Proviso exists in this case to extend the period of limitation of 5 years. It is in this background the Tribunal was justified in setting aside the order passed by the appellate authority and in restoring the order passed by the original authority. Therefore, there is no merit in this appeal. Ac ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
