Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1998 (3) TMI 654

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... chasers in the State of Karnataka and have exported these items. The validity of entry 13a of the Third Schedule to the Act have been assailed on the ground that it is violative of section 5(1) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Reliance is placed on the decision given in the case of Nipha Exports Pvt. Limited v. State of Haryana [1998] 108 STC 337 (P H), wherein the machinery and the parts purchased by the assessee and despatched to its head office for export in the execution of orders of foreign buyers were held not liable to tax. In the case of the assessee the purchases have been made from unregistered dealer and by the charging section 6 liability of purchase tax comes into play. The dispute is in respect of the period prior to insert .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s Tax Act for giving relief in respect of penultimate sale was as under: According to section 5(1) of the Central Sales Tax Act, a sale or purchase of goods can qualify as a sale in the course of export of the goods out of the territory of India only if the sale or purchase has either occasioned such export or is by a transfer of documents of title to the goods after the goods have crossed the customs frontiers of India. The Supreme Court has held (vide: Mohd. Serajuddin v. State of Orissa [1975] 36 STC 136; AIR 1975 SC 1564) that the sale by an Indian exporter from India to the foreign importer alone qualifies as a sale which has occasioned the export of the goods. According to the Export Control Orders, exports of certain goods can be .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... objects and reasons was taken into consideration and it was observed thus: Two things become clear from this statement: first, Mod. Serajuddin s decision [1975] 36 STC 136 (SC), is specifically referred to as necessitating the amendment and secondly, penultimate sales made by small and medium scale manufacturers to an export canalising agency or private export house to enable the latter to export those goods in compliance with existing contracts or orders are regarded as inextricably connected with the export of the goods and hence earmarked for conferral of the benefit of the exemption. But here again, existing contract with whom is not clarified. In other words, on this crucial point the statement is silent and does not throw light o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... in the course of export. 8.. Provisions of entry 13a of the Third Schedule cannot be said to be suffering from any illegality, after coming into force of section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act. Purchases which have been made from unregistered dealer in compliance of the pending order have specifically been excluded under section 5(3) and therefore in such a situation, the benefit could be taken only after the insertion of section 5(3). For the previous period the liability which has been created by Entry 13a of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act cannot be said to be contrary to the provisions of section 5(1) of the Central Sales Tax Act. The petitions having no force are accordingly dismissed. Petitions dismissed. - - TaxTMI - TMITa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates