9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (12) TMI 876X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... urt by which the Committee of Disputes was abolished - the application filed seeking clearance from the Committee of Disputes was dismissed on 2nd November, 2006 - Thus, the right of the appellant to pursue the challenge with regard to the demand for ₹ 15.66 crores was not permitted by the Committee of Disputes – Decided against Appellant. - CEXA No. 23 of 2013 - - - Dated:- 12-11-2013 - ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on 02.11.2006, was dismissed. The second application filed on 11th February, 2011, therefore, cannot be considered as an application pending before the Committee on Disputes as on 17.02.2011. In these circumstances, we do not find any merit in the Misc. application and accordingly, the same is dismissed. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant has drawn our attention to a list of dates ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... th regard to Rs.15.66 crores was enforced against the appellant, which the appellant duly paid during the period between September, 2007 and March, 2008. The case of the appellant is that such payment was made under protest and thereafter, a fresh application was made before the Committee of Disputes seeking reconsideration of the issue. During the pendency of that application the judgment and ord ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
