9911796707
TMI Blog2001 (3) TMI 996X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tion of India by the petitioner is to an order dated March 29, 2000, passed by the Additional Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Indore, in its revisional jurisdiction. Facts in brief that led to passing of impugned order and then this writ need mention. 2.. Petitioner is engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of basic drugs which are used in manufacture of medicines. Petitioner is subjected ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... In the revision, the petitioner filed forms C and H which they could not file before assessing officer. By impugned order, the learned revisionary authority declined to take those C and H forms on record and dismissed the revision thereby, upholding the assessment order. It is against this order the petitioner has filed this writ. 4.. Heard Shri G.M. Chafekar, learned Senior Counsel with Shri ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ecord, then the consequence of the same is to set aside the order of revision and also that of assessing officer and remand the case to the assessing officer to make fresh assessment after taking into account the C and H forms filed by the petitioner. Since, the assessing officer is directed to make fresh assessment, the petitioner is at liberty to raise all issues in support of their case. 7.. A ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
