Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2000 (1) TMI 969

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hereinafter referred to as the "Tendu Patta Adhiniyam") read with rule 8 of the "M.P. Tendu Patta (Vyapar Viniyaman) Niyamavali, 1966" ("Tendu Patta Rules") and purchase tendu patta in the State of Madhya Pradesh for the purpose of manufacture of bidis in their industries located outside the territories of Madhya Pradesh in West Bengal. In W.P. No. 599 of 1998, order of the Managing Director, M.P. State Minor Forest Produce (respondent No. 3) dated May 23, 1994, by which sales tax/commercial tax has been charged at 20 per cent and the bill No. 12 dated October 28, 1997 issued to the petitioner company charging tax at 20 per cent and surcharge at 15 per cent has been challenged on the ground that since the sale of tendu patta to the petition .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ix the price at which tendu leaves shall be purchased from growers of tendu leaves other than the State Government during the year while section 8 provides for opening of depots and publication of price list, etc., at the depots. Section 10 deals with registration of every grower of tendu leaves if the quantity of leaves grown by him during a year is likely to exceed such quantity as may be prescribed while section 11 requires every manufacturer of bidis and every exporter of tendu leaves to get himself registered within such period as may be prescribed and such registered manufacturer or exporter to furnish declaration in such form as may be prescribed. Section 12 provides for disposal of leaves and lays down that tendu leaves purchased by .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed, it constitutes inter-State sale and is chargeable to sales tax only under the Central Sales Tax Act and not under the State Act. According to the learned counsel, since the purchase of tendu leaves could not have been subjected to sales tax under the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958, presently the Commercial Tax Act, the bills issued/raised by the respondent-federation charging tax under the provisions of the State Act deserve to be quashed/modified, so as to include only the tax chargeable under the Central Act. Learned counsel has invited attention to the decision of this Court in Orient Paper and Industries Ltd., Orissa v. State of M.P. [1982] 15 VKN 272 and the decision in Orient Paper and Industries Ltd. v. State of Madhya Pradesh .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... movement of goods must occasion specifically in accordance with the terms of the contract for sale. Learned counsel for the federation has placed reliance on the decision in Maharashtra Timber Laghu Udyog Mahasangh v. State of M.P. [1985] 18 VKN 195 (MP) in support of his contention that where sale of timber in auctions in various forest depots in Madhya Pradesh under the M.P. Van Upaj (Vyapar Viniyaman) Adhiniyam which is similar to the Tendu Patta Adhiniyam has been held to constitute intra-State sale, the sale of tendu patta in identical circumstances and situation cannot be said to constitute inter-State sale attracting tax only under the Central Sales Tax Act. In Maharashtra Timber Laghu Udyog Mahasangh [1985] 18 VKN 195 (MP), the memb .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... not a case where the sale or purchase had occasioned the movement of goods from within the State to other State. Learned counsel has further submitted that since under the M.P. Van Upaj (Vyapar Viniyaman) Adhiniyam also agents are required to be appointed under section 4, there is restriction on purchase or transport of specified forest produce and growers and manufacturers, traders and consumers of specified forest produce are required to obtain registration, there is no difference between the provisions of Tendu Patta Adhiniyam and the said Van Upaj Adhiniyam of 1969. Even with regard to the disposal, similar provisions are contained in section 12 of both the Acts and re-sale of excess specified forest produce is restricted by section 12- .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates