2014 (1) TMI 734

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... g Authority disallowed cenvat credit of Rs. 23,11,160-00 under rule 14 r/w proviso to Sec. 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (the Act), appropriated Rs. 5,48,458-00 already deposited by the petitioner/appellant and set out a demand for the balance Rs. 17,62,702-00. The Commissioner (appeals) upheld the adjudicating order and dismissed the petitioner's appeal. Thus the present appeal and this pet .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d view the petitioner/appellant is seen to have an arguable case in the substantive appeal. 3. We therefore consider it appropriate to grant waiver of the pre-deposit for preferring the appeal, on condition that the petitioner deposits 50% of the duty as assessed in the Order in Original and as confirmed in appeal (after taking credit for the amount already deposited, if any). Learned counsel for .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X