9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (1) TMI 1463X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... i Mohinder Singh, vide letter dated 26-3-2012 requested the appellant to inspect the file on 29-3-2012 but he declined inspection on that day on the grounds that the file was under submission. That in fact he submitted the file to Registrar on 23-3-2012 and the file had not been received back. Shri Mohinder Singh, Asstt. Registrar, therefore is prima facie responsible for failing to make available the file for inspection to the appellant in spite of initially offering file for inspection and thereafter failing to get back to the appellant and allowing inspection. Both the CPIOs are prima facie responsible for delay in providing information to the appellant - Decided in favour of Appellant. - Case No. CIC/SS/A/2012/001338 - - - Dated:- 10- ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pay order of Rs. 230/- for 115 pages of information and also requested that the remaining records be made available to him for inspection. However, in the meantime the appellant had filed an appeal before the FAA. The FAA by his order dated 20-1-2012, directed the CPIO to supply the 115 pages of documents requested and to trace out Part-II of file and make it available for inspection in 15 days. Shri Jain, the appellant, submitted a letter dated 25-1-2012 to the FAA requesting for issue of directions for providing inspection of the file requested by him in clause B of his RTI application as well. Moreover, he requested, since the CPIO, by his letter dated 11-11-2011 had forwarded his request for information to the Registrar, therefore direc ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... und that the file is under submission. On 30-3-2012 Shri Mohinder Singh, Asstt. Registrar informed the appellant the said file has been submitted to Registrar on 23-3-2012 and has not been received back, as soon as the file is received back from Registrar, CESTAT, the same would be made available for inspection. The appellant, through his letter dated 30-5-2012 addressed to Shri Mohinder Singh requested him to intimate the dates and Diary nos. under which the said file has been in movement since, the appellant alleged, it is apparent from his conduct that he has circumvented and defied the order of the FAA. Failing to receive any response, the appellant has filed the present appeal before the Commission in which he submits that both Shri S. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
