9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (2) TMI 549X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... a & Anr. [2005 (9) TMI 80 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] - Held that:- substance in the submission of learned counsel for the appellant that the questions which the High Court had to answer were not really dependent on the upholding of the constitutional validity of Section 154 and the High Court ought to have answered those questions. - matter remanded back to High Court to deal with the questions of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... her the CESTAT was correct in disposing of the appeal filed by the appellant after only giving them an opportunity of arguments on the stay application? (ii) Whether the Courts below have correctly appreciated the fact that Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 prescribed for issuance of a show cause notice and limitation thereunder for demand of duty in the facts of the present case while ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ing an ex parte order without giving an opportunity of personal hearing to the appellant had violated the principles of natural justice as the same had taken away the right of the appellant to represent their case and file material and submissions in support of their case." 2. We notice that the High Court did not answer the questions of law. The High Court, however, referred to a judgment of th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
