9911796707
TMI Blog2004 (7) TMI 614X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he order passed by the learned single Judge on February 14, 2003 in W.P. No. 212 of 2003 between the parties. The appellant is a registered dealer under the provisions of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act" since repealed). The appellant carries on business of commission agent. For the assessment year 1994-95, appellant was assessed to sales tax b ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nce either at Calcutta or at Indore. When this fact came to the light, respondents issued show cause notice under section 19 of the Act for reassessment of the earlier order of assessment passed on June 27, 2001. As a result, on the basis of fake documents, deductions were wrongly allowed and it was a case of deliberate evasion of tax on the part of the appellant. 3.. Appellant filed a reply rai ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hought it fit to issue show cause notice to the respondents so as to solicit their reply. Reply on behalf of the State Government has been filed wherein it has been specifically stated that in view of the provisions contained in section 81 of the Adhiniyam, no fault can be found or attributed to the initiation of the proceedings under section 19 of the Repealed Act. 5.. We have heard learned cou ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tal authorities have found that certain deductions were erroneously allowed on the basis of the fake documents submitted by the appellant-assessee. Thus, on the basis of the wrong deduction appellant certainly incurred a liability to pay the evaded tax under the Repealed Act, therefore, the departmental authorities were justified in proceeding against the appellant under section 19 of the Act no ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
