2005 (2) TMI 799

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ts Nos. 1 and 2 and Mr. Maitra, learned counsel appearing for the State-respondents, it appears that the only point requires adjudication by this Court at this stage is whether the petitioner should be given any interest on the amount deposited earlier or not. The Tribunal by passing the impugned order dated August 6, 2004 [Anil Kumar Todi v. A.C.C.T., Colootala Charge (Case No. 316 of 2004)] did .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 4.. After due consideration of relevant facts and materials, we are, however, inclined to accept the contention made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and having regard to the earlier stand of the division Bench of this Court in W.P.T.T. No. 24 of 2001 (printed infra), we think that the petitioner should be given interest at 6 per cent per annum. 5.. The aforesaid amount of interest .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X