2006 (5) TMI 452

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r 7, 2005, and has been filed on May 3, 2006. Nobody appeared for the applicant. Heard the learned Departmental Representative and considering that the applicant is a cooperative factory at Khanapur Dist. Sangli of Maharashtra and the issue is service tax on motor transport service, which was in dispute. The delay is condoned. The appeal is filed against the dismissal order of the Commissioner .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s pre-deposit requirements of section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. In this view of the matter, we would once again direct the applicant to pre-deposit the said amount of Rs. 1,74,000 and report compliance on July 31, 2006. On such compliance being ascertained, further pre-deposit requirement would stand waived and recovery stayed pending regular hearing of the appeal. If the pre-deposit is .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X