9911796707
TMI Blog2006 (8) TMI 560X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 7, 1998 relating to the assessment years 1987-88 and 1988-89. The dealer/opposite party (hereinafter referred to as the dealer ) claimed to be an association of the brick kiln owners and was engaged in the business of buying and selling of coal. It was registered under the U.P. Trade Tax and Central Sales Tax Acts. The coal was imported against the declaration form XXXI as contemplated under s ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s before the Tribunal, which have been rejected by the impugned order. Heard Sri B.K. Pandey, learned Standing Counsel and Sri R.R. Agrawal, learned counsel for the dealer. The learned Standing Counsel submitted that the dealer was not able to substantiate that the freight was paid by the brick kiln owners to the railways, but even assuming that the freight was paid by the brick kiln owners, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, I have perused the order of the Tribunal and the authorities below. In the present case, dealer was registered under the U.P. Trade Tax Act and Central Sales Tax Act. Coal was imported against form XXXI from outside the State of U. P. and forms C were also issued to the selling party. Goods were imported through the railway and the railway ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... made prior to the sale and, thus, it would be a part of the turnover. Reliance is placed on the decisions of this court in the case of Commissioner of Trade Tax v. Ramapati Tewari Jainath Tewari [2005] UPTC 76 and Commissioner of Trade Tax v. Sharma Coal Co., Azamgarh [2008] 16 VST 517 (All) [App]; [2005] UPTC 1165. In the result, both the revisions are allowed. The order of the Tribunal is set ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
