2011 (12) TMI 439

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ered duty twice from the customers. Therefore in these set of facts, bar of unjust enrichment is not applicable to the case - Decided in favour of assessee. - E/170/2011 - Final Order No. A/60/2012-WZB/C-II(EB) - Dated:- 9-12-2011 - Shri Ashok Jindal and P.R. Chandrasekharan, JJ. Ms. Purnima Lakshminarayanan, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri Navneet, Addl. Commissioner (AR), for the Re .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y the department before the Commissioner (Appeals) on the ground the appellant has not passed the bar of unjust enrichment. Against that order the appellant are before us. 2. Heard the ld. Counsel and the AR. After hearing both sides, we find the appeal itself can be disposed of at this stage. Therefore, after waiver of requirement of pre-deposit, we take up the appeal itself for disposal. 3. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X