2010 (2) TMI 1099

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ost officer as per annexure O. Against the said order, it was in appeal before the Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes who by order dated April 25, 2009 accepted the appeal and set aside the order made in terms of annexure O. The Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes by exercising suo motu revisional powers under section 64(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short, the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... were consigned from M/s. Bridgestone Asia Pacific Pvt. Ltd., Singapore to M/s. Bridgestone India Pvt. Ltd., Madhya Pradesh via Chennai Harbour. The learned counsel would further submit that M/s. Bridgestone India Pvt. Ltd., has its branch office at Bangalore. In terms of the stock transfer order issued by the head office, the goods were being transported to Bangalore and there has not been vio .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... x Act. In order to reject the submission, we state that the import of goods came to an end after goods were received at Chennai port. Thereafter if there were to be any internal arrangement, for stock transfer that would not entitle the appellant to divert the goods to some other destination other than the one mentioned in the invoice. The check-post officer has levied three times penalty. T .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X