9911796707
TMI Blog2010 (2) TMI 1100X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... previous management. In the absence of documents, as stated tay the petitioner certainly it is not possible for the petitioner to reply and give proper explanation to the huge demand made by the respondent-Department. In such view of the matter, this court sets aside the notice dated December 24, 2009 and permits the petitioner to appear before the second respondent on February 15, 2010, through its authorised representative, in which event, the second respondent shall give opportunity to the petitioner to peruse the entire records and take copies at his own cost, relating to the petitioner’s-company for the period from 1978-79 to 1997-98 and sufficient time shall be granted by the second respondent as par the requirement, not exceeding fo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... stwhile management headed by Chabbria group on behalf of Dunlop, pertaining to the abovementioned assessment years. 3. Copies of assessment orders whether provisional or final. 4. Copies of any revision of assessment. 5. Certificate regarding method/mode of service of proceedings referred to above including assessment order. 6. Copies of returns filed by the company for the abovementioned assessment years." The learned counsel would further submit that they have C forms and F forms to show that they are entitled for nearly 520 crores by way of exemption. It is seen that the petitioner-company has thereafter filed W.P. No. 43578 of 2006 before this court challenging the said notice dated October 18, 2006. In the writ petition also, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... able them to represent the matter before the concerned authority or the appellate forum for quantification of the actual and real liability, if any. There is also a further representation on December 4, 2009 with the same prayer. It is thereafter, the impugned notice dated December 24, 2009 was issued by the second respondent wherein it is stated that the documents requested by the petitioner has been furnished to his representative Mr. S. A.R. Felix on January 8, 2007, January 11, 2007, April 18, 2007 and June 5, 2007 with proper acknowledgement and inspite of the furnishing of the information, the amount has not been paid and therefore, the petitioner was directed to pay within seven days. It is seen that on January 18, 2010, the second ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
