9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (7) TMI 119X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nt is that they had not received impugned order nor they have received any letters from the Supdt Office. We find that though the appellant is stating on oath that he has not received copy of the impugned order, there is a contradiction in as much as the acknowledgement card which indicates serving of OIA on the appellant’s address is the same where the appellant’s office is situated and the addre ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hil Dave (Adv.) For the Respondent : Shri M Kutty (AR) JUDGEMENT Per : Mr. M.V. Ravindran; This application is filed for condonation of delay of 604 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. 2. Heard both sides and perused the records. 3. Ld Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the appellant had not received OIA dated 4.1.2012. It is his submissio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... re furnished due to which the appeal could not be filed and most importantly it is stated on oath that the appellant did not receive the OIA nor any letters from the dept office. 4. Ld Dept Rep on the other hand draw our attention to the letter dtd Aug. 30, 2013 written by the Supdt. of ST, Bharuch wherein reference of 7 letters dtd 16.4.2012 onwards were mentioned and the appellant herein kept ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ice is situated and the address given in the appeal memoranda and said acknowledgment card are the same. We find no proper explanation given. They also stated that the signature or scribbling on the acknowledgement card is neither the secretary nor any of the staff engaged. We are unable to accept the explanation given by the secretary of the appellant co-op society for the simple reason that they ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
