9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (7) TMI 775X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... an appeal before the Appellate Authority as against the order dated 14.2.2014 passed by the respondent, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such time, the respondent shall not take any coercive steps for collection by the order dated 14.02.2014. - opportunity grated to the petition to file an appeal before CESTAT, tribunal to consider the matter ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... authorised to function as a customs broker for handling and processing import and export documents filed by various importers. While so, during the course of such business activity, on behalf of the petitioner firm, certain bills were filed in the name of M/s.V.J.Enterprises, Chennai, as importers of clearance of imported Lime Stone Powder from Malaysia. Such clearance were investigated by the D ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , it was proposed to impose penalty. On receipt of the notice, the petitioner has submitted a detailed reply on 27.01.2014 and requested to afford an opportunity of hearing. While the petitioner was anticipating for a personal hearing, the respondent passed an order dated 15.01.2014, suspending the licence issued to the petitioner by referring to the above events. After suspending the licence, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s directed not to take any coercive steps. Therefore, the learned Senior counsel would pray for a similar order in this matter also. 4. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with the observation that the petitioner shall prefer an appeal before the Appellate Authority as against the order dated 14.2.2014 passed by the respondent, within a period of three weeks from the date of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
