9911796707
TMI Blog2010 (4) TMI 1022X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... vernment Pleader, ORDER :- MRS. CHITRA VENKATARAMAN J.-The petitioner herein opted to pay compounding tax as per section 3(4) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, as the assessee expected the turnover for the year 2007-08 as between Rs. 10 lakhs and Rs. 50 lakhs. The petitioner filed the monthly returns in form K disclosing the turnover and corresponding tax at 0.5 per cent. It is state ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rified that if the turnover of the assessee exceeded Rs. 50,00,000 in the middle of the year, then the assessee would not be assessed at the compounded rate of tax under section 3(4) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and he has to pay higher rate of tax and eligible for input-tax credit for the purchases made from the beginning of the year. The said clarification given in the case of ind ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the respondent that the petitioner had paid tax at four per cent and 12.5 per cent for every month as per section 3(2) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner pointed out to section 3(4) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax (Second Amendment) Act, 2008 to substantiate his case as regards the availing of input-tax credit in respect of turnover ex ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... fication dated August 29, 2007 and hence, the same was liable to be set aside. On the admitted facts as to the petitioner's turnover is more than Rs. 50 lakhs, the Commissioner's clarification is binding on the assessing authority, it is necessary that the assessment has to be reviewed in accordance with law as well as the clarification. It however has to be noted that in the rectification ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
