9911796707
TMI Blog1981 (8) TMI 228X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... jn./Order No. 16/81, dated 21-4-81 passed by the Collector of Central Excise, Hyderabad. 2. A personal hearing was granted by the Board to the appellants on 31-8-1981 at Madras when Shri P S. Subramaniam, Authorised Representative, appeared on their behalf. 3. Reiterating the submissions in the memorandum of the appeal, the Representative also filed written submissions which have been taken ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... otification is filed by the appellants for availing of the exemption contained therein. 8. The time when such declaration is required to be filed has, however, not been specified in the Notification. 9. The Form in which the declaration is to be filed has also not been prescribed in the Notification. 10. The Board observes that the appellants had sent a letter dated 23-6-1980 (received by ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cation No. 111/78-CE, dated 9-5-1978, contains the information against Item 6 of the Schedule (Value/Quantity of the goods estimated to be cleared in the current financial year) that such value is not likely to exceed ₹ 5 lakhs. 14. The Board also observes that had the appellants written a simple letter satisfying the requirements of the declaration Notification No. 80/80-CE, dated 19-6-1 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
