2014 (9) TMI 526

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... petition has been served in the office of Mr. Sarvesh Jain. 2. Counsel for petitioner submits that self same controversy came to be examined & decided by the Coordinate Bench in DB Civil Writ Petition No. 1891/2013 (Manglam Cement Limited v. The Superintendent, Central Excise Range-III Kota & Ors.) & Other connected petitions vide judgment dated 1-3-2013 [2013 (290) E.L.T. 353 (Raj.) = 2013 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rd as contemplated by the Act at the earliest and preferably within a period of three weeks here from. The petitioners would unfailingly cooperate with the forums to meet the time frame fixed. It is made clear that this Court has not offered its comment on the merits of the appeals and/or interim applications filed and that the concerned forums would take appropriate decisions thereon without in a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... strained from taking coercive steps for recovery of the demand during the said period. 4. The fact (supra) has not been controverted by the counsel appearing for respondents, Mr. Sarvesh Jain as regards the orders passed, referred to supra. 5. In the light of the orders (supra), the present petition stands disposed of with direction to the appellate authority/CESTAT to hear and decide .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X