2010 (10) TMI 972

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 2. In the impugned order the Commissioner (Appeals) has dropped the demand against the respondent relying on the decision of Madura Coats Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE reported in 2005 (190) E.L.T. 450, wherein the duty demand was dropped against the respondent holding that duty rightly be paid by the respondent on transaction value, at the time of clearance of the capital goods, which they have used for a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ins India Ltd. v. CCE reported in 2007 (219) E.L.T. 911 (Tri.-Mum.), this issue has been dealt by this Tribunal holding that the provisions of Rule 3(4) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 and Rule 3(5) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2005 are not attractable on removal of the capital goods removed after use and duty has been paid on transaction value. Same view has been confirmed by the Mumbai High Court report .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X