1984 (8) TMI 323

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... DER Question for decision in these two appeals, originally filed as Revision Applications to the Government of India, transferred to the Tribunal and being taken up as appeals, which are being disposed of by this common order are classification of `As is machines imported by the appellants under Heading 72(b)-ICT as claimed by the appellants or Heading 73-ICT as held by the lower authorities .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... by the Appellate Collector of Customs, Bombay, it appears that the goods were classified under Heading 73-ICT and not under Heading 72(b)-ICT, as claimed by the appellants and were also held liable to countervailing duty under Tariff Item 33D of the Central Excise Tariff as Office Machines. The orders were upheld in appeal by the Appellate Collector of Customs, Bombay, hence the present appeals. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of C.E.T., Shri Sundara Raman relied on appellants own case reported in 1980 E.L.T. 274. 5. On behalf of the Department, Shri Chandramouli, learned Senior Departmental Representative had no comments to make on the appellants claim. 6. Though copies of precedents at 4(i) and (ii) above are claimed to have been filed along with the papers, the same are not available. Another Government of In .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X