TMI Blog1993 (3) TMI 351X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... roff JUDGMENT : The following Order of the Court was delivered: Heard counsel for the petitioners as well as the counsel for the respondents. We see no reason to entertain this special leave petition. It is established by the decision of this Court in Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. and Ors. v. State of U.P. and Ors., [1990] 1 S.C.C. 109 that so far as the industrial alcohol is concerned ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... has held that the Central Government has the exclusive power to grant a licence for the the manufacture of Industrial Alcohol. It is not necessary for the petitioner to obtain a PD-2 licence from the Excise Commissioner, U.P., Allahabad before starting its distillery for the manufacture of Industrial Alcohol. The provisions in the U.P. Excise Manual relating to taking of PD-2 licence are not appl ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... alve, learned counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh submitted that before manufacturing industrial alcohol, the Respondent-company has to manufacture rectified spirit and that rectified spirit can be coverted into potable liquor by merely adding water. May be so. The observations made by the High Court and the law laid down by this Court recognise and safeguard the power of the State Government t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... recting the Government to do anything, or to make any supplies, contrary to the Provisions of the Molasses control order or any other law governing the supply of molasses. The supply of molasses to the Respondent shall be made in accordance with law. Mr. Salve raised certain other contentions but we did not allow him to do, so in view of the fact that those contentions were not urged before the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|