2015 (1) TMI 796

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... issioner of Central Excise, Panchkula was wrongly impleaded as party-respondent, whereas the Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh should have been made a party. None of these grounds would constitute a valid reason for recalling order dated 16-3-2012 particularly when at the time of admission of the appeal, learned counsel for the review-applicant-respondent was present - Recallind of order .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ds would constitute a valid reason for recalling order dated 16-3-2012 particularly when at the time of admission of the appeal, learned counsel for the review-applicant-respondent was present (Mr. Gurpreet Singh, learned Standing Counsel). The hearing of CEA No. 191 of 2010 is, however, a different matter. Order dated 16-3-2012 passed in CEA No. 53 of 2010 may have to be placed before the Benc .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X