9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (2) TMI 425X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ted period, the requirement of pre-deposit of balance amount of duty demand, interest and penalty would stand waived and recovery thereof stayed. - Partial stay granted. - Excise Stay No. 53351/2014 in Appeal No. E/52979/2014-EX(DB) - Stay Order No. 50186/ 2015 - Dated:- 6-1-2015 - Honble Mr. Rakesh Kumar And Honble Mr. S.K. Mohanty,JJ. For the Petitioner : Shri Sudhir Malhotra, Advocate ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ner by an order passed by him as denied the benefit of the exemption notification no.49-50/03-CE and this order of the Asstt. Commissioner was upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals). The appellant have also filed an appeal No. E/576/2012 against the Commissioner (Appeals)s order upholding the denial of exemption under notification no.49-50/03-CE, which is pending before the Tribunal. 3. After the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s such, confirmed duty demand of ₹ 15,27,002/- along with interest under Section 11 AB/11AA. Besides this, he also imposed penalty of equal amount on the Appellants under Section 11 AC. Against this order of the Commissioner, the present appeal along with stay application has been filed by the appellant. 4. Heard both the sides in respect of stay application. 5. Shri Sudhir Malhotra, A ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nds upon the decision in the linked Appeal no. E/576/2012 regarding their eligibility for exemption under Notification Nos. 49 50/2003-CE, the two appeals should be linked and listed for hearing together. 6. Shri Yashpal Sharma, ld. Departmental Representative, while opposing the stay application, pleaded that he has no objection to the proposal of the ld. Counsel for the appellant for pre-de ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
