2015 (2) TMI 568

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... i Radhakrishna, Advocate, M. Balagopal, Advocate For the Respondent : Dr. A. K. Nigam, Addl. Commissioner (AR) ORDER Per : B.S.V.MURTHY Vide Misc. Order No.20472-20473/2014 dated 24.2.2014, the stay applications filed by the appellant were decided and appellant was directed to deposit the entire adjudication dues before 31.3.2014 and report compliance on 15.4.2014. This order was passed takin .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s faxed to the Tribunal. It was also submitted that the case was not figuring in the website of CESTAT and they presumed that there was no sitting on 24.2.2014. On these grounds the modification of the stay order is sought. 3. It is settled law that this Tribunal has no power of review. Modification can be made only if there is an apparent error on the face of the order. In this case, no such err .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X