2015 (2) TMI 903

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... byMs. Padma Divakar JUDGEMENT L. Narasimha Reddy J.- 1. This petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges the order dated June 30, 2014, passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) ("the CIT(A)"). By the impugned order dated June 30, 2014, the petitioner's application for stay of assessment order March 27, 2014, in its pending appeal for the assessment year 201 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... der dated June 30, 2014. As against the above, the jurisdiction with the Assessing Officer of staying the demand under section 220(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ("the Act"), and that of the Commissioner of Income-tax to stay the demand, is on different considerations, i.e., including other factors over and above the order. The Assessing Officer and the Commissioner do not stay the order in appeal .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e stay application as expeditiously as possible and preferably within three weeks from today. 5. In the meantime, the respondent-Revenue will not adopt any coercive proceedings against the petitioner till the disposal of its stay application by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and for the period of two weeks from the date of the communication of the order passed by the Commissioner of Inc .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X