TMI Blog2015 (3) TMI 589X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... gher penalty is required to be given to the appellant. In these circumstances, I reduce the penalty from ₹ 5,00,000/- to ₹ 1,00,000 - Decided partly in favour of assesse. - Appeal No.C/1290/06-Mum - - - Dated:- 14-3-2014 - Ashok Jindal, J. For the Appellant : Ms Purnima Singh, Adv. For the Respondent : Shri M S Reddy, DC (AR) JUDGEMENT Per: Ashok Jindal: The ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ntercepted who stated that he is not having any check-in baggage. Then the appellant was asked and she narrated the story of one Shri Firoz Afrikawala has telephoned her; that one lady who is travelling in the same flight having excess baggage for a favour from the appellant to re-check-in excess baggage with some other passenger's baggage. For this act of the appellant, a penalty of ₹ 5 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|