2015 (3) TMI 917

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ld not be sorted out. I feel it is fit case for order of partial pre-deposit of penalty. Accordingly it is ordered that the appellant to deposit ₹ 2 lakh within six weeks - Decided against assessee. - ST/Stay/1965/2011 in Appeal No. ST/942/2011 - Stay Order No. 50052/2015 - Dated:- 9-1-2015 - Hon'ble Mr. Manmohan Singh,JJ. For the Appellants : Ms. Sukriti, Advocate For the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ay is of 2263 days. 2. The matter has been dragging on when the stay application was filed in 2011 and the appellant had been asking to the department to give the detail of calculation of amount of penalty based on number of days. This is simple issue which could have been sorted out within a day or two. But the appellants have not been taken the one point or the other. Similarly the department .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... een going since 2009 onwards for providing details. 5. On the other hand, ld.JCDR submits that sufficient notice was given to fulfill the requirement of natural justice. The appellants have shown no interest and they have not complied with direction and have taken seven years. Now they have come with the plea that the department has not provided documents. 6. I have gone the facts and heard .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X