2013 (12) TMI 1447

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ana, for the respondents. JUDGMENT The petitioner, a private limited company incorporated under Companies Act, 1956, is a registered dealer under the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short, "the HVAT Act") and also under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (for brevity, "the CST Act"). The petitioner was engaged in the business of manufacture of yarns and fabrics. 2. Briefly, the few facts as .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... l-respondent No. 2, whereby the Tribunal vide order dated July 11, 2011 (annexure P4) had partly accepted the appeal except for addition made on account of nonfurnishing of form VATC4. 4. The petitioner feeling aggrieved against the said order has approached this court under articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he correctness and authenticity of the same. 8. The learned State counsel submits that the genuineness of the 46 affidavits and form C4 regarding the input-tax credit have been verified by the Department and the same are found to be genuine. 9. Accordingly, we dispose of the present writ petition by directing respondent No. 4 to re-determine the tax liability by taking into consideration form C4 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X